Teams

CAckels (PCC)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-05-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Jessica Gentile5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Laura Brandt6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-26vs ETindel (Charlotte Country Club)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Gigi Harris6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-25vs MMetzl/KJohnson (Sardis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJulia Murphy / Jenjer Robin vs Emily Battle / Judy Kilduff6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Kate Johnson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-11vs JHutson (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Catherine Bauer4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Vega / Jenjer Robin vs Jennifer Hutson / Anne McCurry2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-04vs CLee/KArenson (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Kelli Arenson6-0, 6-0
2022-03-28vs KDouglas/SLang (Firethorne)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJenjer Robin / Lauren McNeely vs Jenny Harper / Kim King3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Alisa Longo7-6, 6-3
2022-03-21vs MMcArdle (Weddington Chase)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Lutfiye Ugurlu7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-07vs AWagner/KHoracek (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Ashley Whitley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-28vs SKwon (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Melinda van Hecke2-6, 5-7
2022-02-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Ackels vs Natalie Demby6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Carla Ackels
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Julia Murphy
published
2.56
Nicole Vega
published
2.56
Jenjer Robin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Brooks Herman
published 2.5
Karen Schaphorst
published
Lauren McNeely
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenjer Robin + Carla Ackels3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carla Ackels
95W–98L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
2.98
Julia Murphy
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Nicole Vega
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Jenjer Robin
34W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
2.5
Brooks Herman
14W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%82%18%
2.38
Karen Schaphorst
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren McNeely
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.