Teams

BSimpson (Queens)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 10.0 - Tues PM

15 players · average NTRP 4.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLuke Laney / Toni Laney vs Ryan MacY / Kindell Schmitt3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Chang / Sriram Chandra vs Carlos Nolasco Moreno / Sanjana Sudhir3-6, 4-6
2025-07-15vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCarson Rose Tennyson / Depei Yu vs Kindell Schmitt / Christian Hess3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Chang / Sriram Chandra vs Ryan MacY / Sarah Cimmino4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Paterra / Brittany Simpson vs Darri Thayaprasat / Carlos Nolasco Moreno6-4, 6-4
2025-07-08vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Won 21
L#1 DoublesToni Laney / Luke Laney vs Brett Landau / Hannah English Rahill3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Ross Edgar vs Ryan MacY / Sanjana Sudhir6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCallie Schmit / Jordan Paterra vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-01vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesToni Laney / Depei Yu vs Sarah Cimmino / Ryan MacY2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary-Margaret James / Jordan Paterra vs Sanjana Sudhir / Carlos Nolasco Moreno2-6, 0-6
2025-06-24vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarson Rose Tennyson / Depei Yu vs Kindell Schmitt / Brett Landau6-2, 4-6
L#2 DoublesToni Laney / Luke Laney vs Daniela Naupari / Peter Tonon6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrent McKnight / Brittany Simpson vs Sarah Cimmino / Carlos Nolasco Moreno0-6, 0-6
2025-06-17vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Luke Laney vs Kindell Schmitt / Christian Hess4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCallie Schmit / Ross Edgar vs Ryan MacY / Sanjana Sudhir7-5, 6-3
2025-06-10vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDepei Yu / Carson Rose Tennyson vs Mary McGehee / Christiaan Lee-Daigle2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRoss Edgar / Samantha Danesis vs Kindell Schmitt / Carlos Nolasco Moreno6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJared McKiernan / Mary-Margaret James vs Hannah English Rahill / Brett Landau2-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarson Rose Tennyson / Ross Edgar vs Daniela Naupari / Peter Tonon7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesToni Laney / Luke Laney vs Hannah English Rahill / Brett Landau5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCallie Schmit / Jordan Paterra vs Sarah Cimmino / Ryan MacY4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 10.0 - Tues PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSimpson (Queens)2681633229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Depei Yu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.74
Victoria Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.61
Samantha Danesis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.60
4.58
Callie Schmit
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.58
Toni Laney
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 4.5
4.47
Luke Laney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.43
Carson Rose Tennyson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.26
Jared McKiernan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Brittany Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Jordan Paterra
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Brent McKnight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Mary-Margaret James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ross Edgar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sriram Chandra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Laney + Toni Laney1638% gamesnot enough data
Carson Rose Tennyson + Depei Yu1438% gamesnot enough data
Brent McKnight + Callie Schmit033 matchesnot enough data
Callie Schmit + Jordan Paterra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Depei Yu
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.83
Victoria Chang
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.74
5
Samantha Danesis
111W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.61
5
Meghan Bartholomew
66W–46L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.60
5
Callie Schmit
60W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.58
4.5
Toni Laney
173W–51L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.58
Luke Laney
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
4.47
5
Carson Rose Tennyson
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
4.43
Jared McKiernan
7W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Brittany Simpson
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Jordan Paterra
64W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.10
4
Brent McKnight
2W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Mary-Margaret James
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Edgar
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sriram Chandra
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.