Teams

Men of the Fuzz

2022 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-13vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Raad / Ken Azbill vs Mike Buckingham / Kelly Bokn4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-06vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Azbill / Sean Parrish vs Gary Sackett / Ken Coffey1-6, 5-7
2022-06-29vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Pantell / Sean Parrish vs Ken Coffey / Gary Sackett1-6, 3-6
2022-06-29vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesRon Kristensen / Mike MacHado vs Robb Warwick / Kelly Bokn1-6, 1-6
2022-06-08vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Raad / Ken Azbill vs Mike Buckingham / Charles Stearns1-6, 6-7
2022-06-01vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteven Popish / Mike MacHado vs Bob Lopez / Ken Coffey2-6, 4-6
2022-05-25vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Pantell / Sean Parrish vs Mike Kirby / Charles Stearns2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over/9.0M712226161
2Men of the Fuzz1722244275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
George Raad
published 4.5
3.98
Geoffrey Surbeck
published 4.5
3.98
Ron Kristensen
published 4
3.91
Ross Hoffman
published 4
3.87
Derek Gochnour
published 4
3.81
Chad Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
Douglas Shill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Pantell
published
Ken Azbill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike MacHado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sean Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stan Cole
published 0
Steven Popish
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Gochnour + Ross Hoffman1647% games−2.0% vs expected
Ken Azbill + George Raad41049% gamesnot enough data
Derek Gochnour + Chad Vincent0840% gamesnot enough data
Ron Kristensen + Chad Vincent2647% gamesnot enough data
Ken Azbill + Ron Kristensen224 matchesnot enough data
Ken Azbill + Chad Vincent044 matchesnot enough data
Ross Hoffman + Chad Vincent224 matchesnot enough data
Chad Vincent + Geoffrey Surbeck224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
George Raad
13W–19L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Geoffrey Surbeck
26W–37L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Ron Kristensen
65W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Ross Hoffman
130W–71L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Derek Gochnour
42W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Chad Vincent
49W–39L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Douglas Shill
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Pantell
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Azbill
18W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike MacHado
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Parrish
41W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Stan Cole
25W–78L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Popish
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.