Teams

MAC:Manchester Blue:Carpenter/Tatum

2021 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-20vs MAC:Manchester Red:TierneySplit 22
L#1 DoublesAlina Franklin / Carolyn Bryce Morris vs Leslie Marcelynas / Nikki Tierney4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJanis Mulrooney vs Laura Carrigan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelanie Healey / Marcia Tatum vs Kathy Auciello / Sarah Willwerth-Dyer6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEmma Perryman / Jessica Garten vs Stacey Twombly / Mary Miller6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesChristine Woodman / Melanie Healey vs Pam Ciccone / Karen O'Neil2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJanis Mulrooney vs Karin Boudreau6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmma Perryman / Sarah Guido vs Katherine Prestero / Judy Hoyle6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarcia Tatum / Olive Ingraham vs Cheryl Connors / Jeanette Bybee6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMaura Hughes / Christine Woodman vs Kristin Noble / Caroline Figucia6-7, 4-5
W#1 SinglesJanis Mulrooney vs Debora Lunt6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Healey / Jessica Garten vs Dorothy Kelleher / Marjorie Robb6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlina Franklin / Sarah Guido vs Jennifer Licciardi / Kerri Carbone4-6, 5-6
2021-06-15vs MAC:"Team Laurie":ShatfordLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelanie Healey / Janis Mulrooney vs Jennifer Frain / Emily McPherson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Woodman vs Alison Daley6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Guido / Alina Franklin vs Lisa Lambert / Jody Seger6-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesMarcia Tatum / Olive Ingraham vs Patricia McInnis / Priscilla Woods6-2, 7-6
2021-06-01vs MAC:Manchester Red:TierneyWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelanie Healey / Christine Woodman vs Leslie Marcelynas / Nikki Tierney6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJanis Mulrooney vs Julie Crocker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Bryce Morris / Emma Perryman vs Kathy Auciello / Sarah Willwerth-Dyer7-6, 0-0
L#3 DoublesOlive Ingraham / Marcia Tatum vs Laura Carrigan / Mary Miller7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMelanie Healey / Maura Hughes vs Pam Ciccone / Karen O'Neil1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Woodman vs Karin Boudreau3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmma Perryman / Sarah Guido vs Judy Hoyle / Katherine Prestero6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarcia Tatum / Olive Ingraham vs Gina Lagrassa / Elizabeth Roberts6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesAlina Franklin / Melanie Healey vs Holly Gamber / Kristin Noble4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJanis Mulrooney vs Una Nimhurchu-Dennehy6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesOlive Ingraham / Marcia Tatum vs Kerri Carbone / Kimberly Coffin Watson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Bryce Morris / Emma Perryman vs Debora Lunt / Kelley McCarthy6-2, 6-1
2021-05-11vs MAC:"Team Laurie":ShatfordLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcia Tatum / Olive Ingraham vs Rebecca Gyra / Ruzanna Queenan3-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Bryce Morris / Emma Perryman vs Debra Ray / Jody Seger4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Garten / Sarah Guido vs Michelle Kenney / Lisa Lambert6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings33 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PAX:Paxton:O'Connor0616819199
2WESB:Westboro:Fettig/Sullivan-Kreiss06121230220
3NETC:New England TC:ROBINSON0681634233
4LFW:Racquettes:Fordiani/Williams08221025270
5MAC:"Team Laurie":Shatford08191332281
6BRTC:Bass River Green:LaPierre/Gamber08171533295
7DED:Dedham:Deng/Yanoff08191334287
8WAC:Awesome Aces:Calleva/Hoffman08191334287
9BWEL:BSC Wellesley:Hsu/Harris08161634264
10WEY:Weymouth:Garrow08171536291
11BRTC:Bass River Blue:Connors/Ciccone08161637300
12MAC:Manchester Blue:Carpenter/Tatum08151739291
13BCC:Black Rock:Lasch/Cox08141839297
14SSY:SSYMCA:Johnson/Landry08151740288
15MAC:Manchester Red:Tierney08131941318
16DCP:Dedham CP: Freniere/Williamson08151741305
17WOB:Woburn:Blender08122045310
18SFT:Spark F&T Red:Sollecito/Stamulis0932416227
19MLTC:Team Mullaney/Witty0930617225
20NewEngland/Levine/Adult40&Over3.5W0927922241
21NEW:The Smashers:Sullivan/Page09261026266
22W109:Sets in the City:Klein/DiVincenzo09241234295
23SFT:Spark F&T Blue:Dasilva09211535301
24WESF:Westfit:Weisenbloom/Lowe09211535290
25WAY:Wayside Wonders:Pulnik/Burri09201639323
26TRU:Trull Brook:Reynolds/Park09181842307
27KIG:Kingsbury Knights:Broderick09152145344
28CED:Cedardale:Moore/Riley09132351360
29IRCC:Indian Ridge CC:Edelmann/Burns09132351373
30SFT:Spark F&T Green:Cavallini/Magary09122453350
31WOB:Woburn:Natale0992759379
32BBC:Brown Billone:Donovan0963064399
33WESF:The Westfits:Tanner0913569417

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Janis Mulrooney
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Alina Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Emma Perryman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Melanie Healey
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.12
Christine Woodman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Jessica Garten
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Bryce Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Faye Ryding
published
Marcia Tatum
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Maura Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Olive Ingraham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Sarah Guido
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma Perryman + Carolyn Bryce Morris5447% games+4.9% vs expected
Olive Ingraham + Marcia Tatum9553% games+2.7% vs expected
Christine Woodman + Melanie Healey3353% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Garten + Marcia Tatum2342% gamesnot enough data
Emma Perryman + Sarah Guido3256% gamesnot enough data
Alina Franklin + Sarah Guido134 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Garten + Emma Perryman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janis Mulrooney
53W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Alina Franklin
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Emma Perryman
22W–20L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Melanie Healey
39W–37L career · 7 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Woodman
39W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
Jessica Garten
20W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Carolyn Bryce Morris
12W–10L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Faye Ryding
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marcia Tatum
24W–13L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maura Hughes
15W–13L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Olive Ingraham
17W–17L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Guido
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.