Teams

LABonham 40+ Jetton

2023 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-19vs LKRobbins/RRLost 12
W#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Kathleen Navola6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnna Bonham / Kristine Bienstock vs Phebby Benton / Kimberly Haigney1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSherry Lerme / Sheryl Chapman vs Patricia Sharawy / Cindy Aprile5-7, 1-6
2023-05-12vs LKNorcross/EdgemoorWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlison Siebold / Amy Marin vs Melissa Smith / Leah Russell3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Caroline Ray6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnna Bonham / Sarah Norton vs Amy Gandy / MaryGwen Murash1-6, 3-6
2023-05-05vs LAJONES/PENLost 12
L#1 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Ming Keadle4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherry Lerme / Noreen Soos vs Erin Hallman / Keryn Rush6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnna Bonham / Janice Ingram vs Kira Skill / Tracie Persinger1-6, 2-6
2023-04-28vs LABrandon/LNTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Haigney / Sheryl Chapman vs Karen Hallman / Lisa Yee0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJan Wildman / Sherry Lerme vs Susan Lunsford / Elizabeth Kaufman2-6, 1-6
2023-04-21vs LAEdenfield/LNTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Bonham / Robin Underwood vs Annie Edenfield / SHARON WELLS2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Jennifer Higgins4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Haigney / Sheryl Chapman vs Tracey McKenna / Stephanie Clancy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-31vs LMKPortaro/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Siebold / Amy Marin vs Sheila Wakeman / Kim Kelly Senff6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Dina White6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Haigney / Sheryl Chapman vs Shannon Hirschfeld / Stephanny de Gorter6-3, 6-3
2023-03-31vs LLMoyer/Foreman JettonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlison Siebold / Amy Marin vs Lisa Moyer / Lori Galleron6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Kimberly Lewis3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Bonham / Sarah Norton vs Elizabeth Foreman / Charlene Whichel4-6, 4-6
2023-03-25vs LKHenry/PACLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Haigney / Sheryl Chapman vs Cheryl Staab / Linda Poston1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Karla Williams6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNoreen Soos / Sherry Lerme vs Martha Wells / Kathy Henry4-6, 1-6
2023-03-24vs LTDudan/JettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesNoreen Soos / Janice Ingram vs Barbara Moore / Naila Campbell2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKristine Bienstock vs Lauren Hession6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Lesso / Sherry Lerme vs Andrea McRorie / Melissa Shipman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kristine Bienstock
usually #1 Singles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.55
Alison Siebold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Margaret Vermillion
published
3.43
Anna Bonham
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.37
Susan Lesso
published
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Sherry Lerme
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Haigney
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Janice Ingram
published
3.25
Noreen Soos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.24
Jan Wildman
published
3.16
Amy Marin
published 3.5
2.81
Sheryl Chapman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noreen Soos + Anna Bonham5950% games−0.3% vs expected
Sherry Lerme + Noreen Soos6551% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Lerme + Anna Bonham4448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristine Bienstock
62W–70L career · 11 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Alison Siebold
71W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Margaret Vermillion
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Anna Bonham
150W–191L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
Susan Lesso
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.37
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Karen Haigney
66W–103L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
Janice Ingram
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Noreen Soos
109W–122L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Jan Wildman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Marin
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Sheryl Chapman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.