Teams

Dahl: Slice Girls

2024 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-14vs Knoch-Dohlin: Tennis the MenaceWon 20
W#2 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Timek / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Megan Knoch-Dohlin / Jennifer Ericson6-1, 6-1
2024-02-22vs Stordahl Kickin AcesWon 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Beth Hank6-4, 6-0
2024-02-15vs Chase's Aces 18+ WinterLost 02
L#2 DoublesSu Ann DeGeorgeo / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Alisa Chase / Mary Frances Price6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Molly Beaghan5-7, 3-6
2024-02-08vs Soberg/SlagleWon 20
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Sooyeon Sung6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Su Ann DeGeorgeo vs Beth Soberg / Brenda Slagle6-1, 6-3
2024-02-01vs Stromberg Smash SquadSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Sharia Carlson6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Meyer / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Sandra Marble / Meredith Stromberg5-7, 4-6
2024-01-25vs Macariola: Tough LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeela Cottew / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Rachel Johnson / Karen Hamm6-1, 6-1
2024-01-18vs Butwin: 'Lucille 3'Won 10
W#2 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Lisa Timek vs Sara Kanive / Rachel Baratz6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-11vs Bloom WinterLost 01
L#2 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Lisa Timek vs Wendy Bloom / Shannon Ellis2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Michelle Joncas
published
3.16
Catherine Hosamane
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Keela Cottew
published
3.02
Su Ann DeGeorgeo
published
2.92
Aleksandra Fermstad
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.76
Lisa Timek
published
Leeza Scheglowski
published
Linda Hauser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aleksandra Fermstad + Lisa Timek4259% games+1.1% vs expected
Catherine Hosamane + Aleksandra Fermstad7162% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Joncas
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Catherine Hosamane
163W–105L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Keela Cottew
18W–34L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Su Ann DeGeorgeo
30W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Aleksandra Fermstad
117W–53L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lisa Timek
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
Leeza Scheglowski
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Hauser
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.