Teams

Justice/Memphis

2025 Combo 40 & Over - Memphis · 7.5 40 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-16vs Deupree/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Yambrek / Lauren Hill vs Brooke Levy / Kathleen Uhlhorn4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Parker Justice / Shelby Ramsey vs Angie Deupree / Laurie McCandless2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Podesta / Karen Johnston vs Joanna Fuhrman / Kelly Gill2-6, 0-6
2025-09-09vs Goetsch/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Yambrek / Wendi Mihalko vs Candace Browning / Sithina Yong3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Sheahan / Elizabeth Kuhlo vs Teresa Goetsch / Anita Kang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Sneed / Missey Hayes vs Dianna Ptacek / Heidi Wharton4-6, 1-6
2025-09-03vs Sammarco/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sammons / Missey Hayes vs Hayley Hudson / SUSAN WOODMAN6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAna Yambrek / Rebecca Reid vs Gina Throckmorton / Beverly Finnell6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephanie Sheahan / Elizabeth Kuhlo vs Tiffany Knighton / Terri Smith4-6, 4-6
2025-09-02vs Martin/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Parker Justice / Lauren Hill vs Sonia Castany / Katie Crews4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIsabel Xu / Wendi Mihalko vs Missy Gulick / Missy Euler6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sammons / Shelby Ramsey vs JoAnn Cooper / Ann McKnight6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Siskin/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Parker Justice / Shelby Ramsey vs Katie Belenchia / Alyssa Ivey4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sammons / Martha Podesta vs Lissa Brink / Marta Mullinix4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesIsabel Xu / Lisa Guyton vs Rachel Baker / Melinda Hoehn6-3, 6-2
2025-08-19vs Eason/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrooke Parker Justice / Lauren Hill vs Ashley Wallace / Natalie Barrett6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Sexton / Shelley Spiro vs Virginia Burbank / Stephanie White5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Bennett / Rebecca Reid vs Stephanie Dent / Shanna Eason3-6, 4-6
2025-08-12vs Churchey/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendi Mihalko / Isabel Xu vs Paige Campbell / Julie Mullins6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Guyton / Shelley Spiro vs Debbie Churchey / Courtney Clift6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Isabel Xu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.95
Ana Yambrek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Jennifer Sammons
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Stephanie Sheahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Brooke Parker Justice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Shelby Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Suzanne Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Wendi Mihalko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Rebecca Reid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Elizabeth Kuhlo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Missey Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Debra Sneed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Shelley Spiro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Martha Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Isabel Xu + Ana Yambrek4167% games+1.5% vs expected
Shelley Spiro + Debra Sneed3451% games−0.2% vs expected
Suzanne Sexton + Isabel Xu4154% games−0.4% vs expected
Missey Hayes + Elizabeth Kuhlo1544% games−3.8% vs expected
Shelley Spiro + Martha Podesta134 matchesnot enough data
Wendi Mihalko + Elizabeth Kuhlo224 matchesnot enough data
Isabel Xu + Jennifer Sammons404 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Parker Justice + Shelby Ramsey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Isabel Xu
24W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Ana Yambrek
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
Jennifer Sammons
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Stephanie Sheahan
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Brooke Parker Justice
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Shelby Ramsey
25W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Suzanne Sexton
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.41
Wendi Mihalko
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Rebecca Reid
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Elizabeth Kuhlo
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Missey Hayes
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Debra Sneed
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Shelley Spiro
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Martha Podesta
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.