← Teams

Marr Team

2021 65&Over Women · 7.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-13vs Northern: Highly StrungLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesLauren Marr / Beverly Davis vs Suzanne Hauber / Sandra Sloane3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-16vs Northern: Highly StrungLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRuth Fellmeth / Lauren Marr vs Lorraine Sharpe / Mary Bunch1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-23vs Northern: Highly StrungSplit 1–1
W#1 DoublesDonna Bjork / Lauren Marr vs Mary Fiess Shaffer / Linda Dygert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren D'Arcangelo / Beverly Davis vs Mary Bunch / Deborah Richards2-6, 6-7
2021-06-16vs Northern: Highly StrungSplit 1–1
W#1 DoublesLauren Marr / Ruth Fellmeth vs Mary Bunch / Wanda Fischer6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Powers / Karen D'Arcangelo vs Sandra Westfall / Noreen Barrett5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-02vs Northern: Highly StrungSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesKaren D'Arcangelo / Donna Bjork vs Mary Bunch / Deborah Richards2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Fellmeth / Lauren Marr vs Suzanne Hauber / Linda Dygert6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Highly Strung328719154
2Marr Team237817126

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Karen D'Arcangelo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —
2.82
Donna Bjork
published 3.5
—
Lauren Marr
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Karen D'Arcangelo
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
3.5
Donna Bjork
0W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2021
92%8%<1%
2.82
—
Lauren Marr
7W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.