Teams

KY\HEN\Robinson

TRI LEVEL 18 & OVER · 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-11vs KY/PUR/ALLENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPranav Haran / Noah Moss vs Jay Clark / Preston Browning7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRaj Jadhav / David Coudret vs Ben Howard / Dane Coles3-6, 3-6
2024-08-11vs KY/PUR/ALLENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNoah Moss / Andrew Liu vs Preston Browning / Jay Clark6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJack Cline / Raj Jadhav vs Chris Allen / Dane Coles4-6, 4-6
2024-08-11vs KY/Henderson/AllingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Liu / Jack Cline vs Mike Salaman / Jordan Holmes7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShaun Skelton / Raj Jadhav vs Bernard Ransford / Jonathan Engel4-6, 3-6
2024-08-11vs KY/Henderson/AllingSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJack Cline / Raj Jadhav vs Britt Decker / Jordan Holmes4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel May / Jay Rietman vs Mike Henning / Adam Harpenau6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Jack Cline
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Shaun Skelton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Robinson
published 4
3.63
Noah Moss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
David Coudret
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel May
published 3.5
Jay Rietman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pranav Haran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Raj Jadhav
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Coudret + Raj Jadhav4165% games+10.1% vs expected
Shaun Skelton + Daniel May4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jack Cline
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.99
Shaun Skelton
66W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Chris Robinson
21W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Noah Moss
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
David Coudret
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Daniel May
38W–55L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jay Rietman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Pranav Haran
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Raj Jadhav
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.