Teams

VCC TEAL

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs CACI REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesDawn Baranek / Nickie Le vs Barbara Hall / Bernadette Rottschafer1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Sinclair vs Karen Wendling3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarnie Brockamp / Teresa Hymowitz vs Karen Eagleton / Diane Wells6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarleen Himel / Kathy Dosen vs Melinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault3-6, 6-7
2023-07-16vs SS-LT NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathy Dosen / Carleen Himel vs Samantha Kirschke / Kimberly Kurban6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Grimes vs Kristi Mathieson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Franklin / Jana Maas vs Karen McIntire / Michelle Rubin6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Hymowitz / Marnie Brockamp vs Jennifer Cree / Andrea Bailey6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-13vs PRC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Quinn / Carleen Himel vs Sheila Curry / Heather Beasley1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Sinclair vs Dana van Daele4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Franklin / Teresa Hymowitz vs Carol Brohl / Lori McDevitt7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMarnie Brockamp / Nickie Le vs Isabella Latak / Cheri Walker6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-06vs CPV BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Quinn / Jana Maas vs Liz Bauer / Mary Lostak2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNickie Le vs Stacia Novak1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Dosen / Teresa Hymowitz vs Carol Lail / Anthea Gerberg1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Franklin / Catherine Sinclair vs Elizabeth Zeller / Jami Keenan5-7, 6-7
2023-06-29vs CR-BP GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesNickie Le / Carleen Himel vs Julie Fujita / Dayna Hines6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathy Dosen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarnie Brockamp / Catherine Sinclair vs Heather Marks / Carol McBroom6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAshley Franklin / Elizabeth Quinn vs Sara Southards / Maggie Ward6-2, 6-0
2023-06-15vs HRCA-S PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesAshley Franklin / Teresa Hymowitz vs Leann Penland / Erin Maloney4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Grimes vs Anne McIntosh2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNickie Le / Marnie Brockamp vs Becky Nemec / Kathy Dudek1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Baranek / Jana Maas vs Cherie Weren / Lisa Walko6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-08vs PRC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNickie Le / Elizabeth Quinn vs Wendy Mathewson / Leslie Hathaway6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Grimes vs Magdalena Chamberlain1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Franklin / Kathy Dosen vs Kelly Glenn / Julie Hernandez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawn Baranek / Catherine Sinclair vs Carrie del Toro / Franny Schmidt6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Ashley Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Kathy Dosen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Carleen Himel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Marnie Brockamp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Teresa Hymowitz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Dawn Baranek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Catherine Sinclair
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Elizabeth Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jana Maas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jessica Grimes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nickie Le
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Quinn + Ashley Franklin9357% games+8.3% vs expected
Ashley Franklin + Carleen Himel13558% games+7.8% vs expected
Carleen Himel + Catherine Sinclair4454% games+7.7% vs expected
Ashley Franklin + Kathy Dosen7453% games+6.1% vs expected
Carleen Himel + Teresa Hymowitz6459% games+5.1% vs expected
Marnie Brockamp + Kathy Dosen6555% games+4.6% vs expected
Catherine Sinclair + Marnie Brockamp4354% games+2.1% vs expected
Ashley Franklin + Marnie Brockamp9554% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Franklin
115W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Kathy Dosen
73W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Carleen Himel
108W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Marnie Brockamp
72W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Teresa Hymowitz
73W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Dawn Baranek
25W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Catherine Sinclair
29W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elizabeth Quinn
54W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jana Maas
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Grimes
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nickie Le
35W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.