Teams

Hopewell Aces

Tri-Level League · Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women CENTRAL

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2020-03-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Hofacker / Jennifer Bredin vs Lisa Vigod / Jacqueline Lomax2-6, 2-6
2020-02-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn Snider / Anne Hofacker vs Chari McClary / Jacqueline Lomax2-6, 5-7
2019-01-25vs HTP Honey DeucesWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Ferrara / Roxanna Choe vs Cheryl-Anne Bliss / Margery Zietchick6-7, 5-4, 1-0
2019-01-05vs HTP Honey DeucesWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Jayamadhuri Ghosh vs Manisha Degaonkar / Diane Harrison6-1, 6-3
2018-11-17vs NassauLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Fabienne Yu vs Stephanie Duke / Lumin Shen4-6, 1-6
2018-10-26vs NassauWon 10
W#2 DoublesJosephine Chan / Roxanna Choe vs Pat Steimle / Mara Wilmot6-0, 6-2
2018-10-20vs PTP FireballsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Faracchio / Madellyn Stoner vs Vera Lawson / Kallie Speller6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Anne Hofacker vs Jennifer Caissie / Barbara Keen6-0, 6-2
2018-10-20vs Nassau TrifectaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Faracchio / Madellyn Stoner vs Patrycia Olivia Przystasz / Christine Syvertson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Keifer / Xiaohong Shang vs Jennifer Martz / Lumin Shen2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Anne Hofacker vs Sharon Becker / Michelle Huxel6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2018-10-13vs Tennis Anyone?Won 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Faracchio / Madellyn Stoner vs Melissa Mercer / Linda Miller7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon Narsiff / Jamie Sandman vs Karen McGinnis / Susan Dixon Thompson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Ann de Waele vs Jennifer Kopec / Lisa Sattel6-2, 7-6
2018-09-29vs NassauLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadellyn Stoner / Alanna Wildgrube vs Betsy Ricker / Erica Rosenberg1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Narsiff / Jacqueline Lomax vs Miell Yi / Jeannine McGhie6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Anne Hofacker vs Diane Harrison / Tanya Tomao6-3, 6-4
2018-09-22vs PRC Jersey GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBlair Woodward Ayers / Mallory Greening vs Jennifer Tan / Shooty Leonard6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJean Boyd / Jacqueline Lomax vs Fabienne Yu / Melinda Trang3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRoxanna Choe / Clare George vs Wu Yang / Josephine Chan6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women CENTRAL have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Alanna Wildgrube
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Roxanna Choe
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.49
Anne Hofacker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Ann de Waele
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Jean Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Blair Woodward Ayers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Faracchio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Clare George
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Lomax
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Sandman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Keifer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Madellyn Stoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Greening
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Narsiff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Xiaohong Shang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Faracchio + Madellyn Stoner4255% games+9.1% vs expected
Ann de Waele + Roxanna Choe5548% games+4.9% vs expected
Anne Hofacker + Roxanna Choe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alanna Wildgrube
82W–64L career · 1 line in 2019
<1%82%18%
3.88
Roxanna Choe
125W–88L career · 9 lines in 2019
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Anne Hofacker
27W–29L career · 5 lines in 2019
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Ann de Waele
109W–102L career · 1 line in 2019
<1%69%31%
3.44
Jean Boyd
107W–104L career · 1 line in 2019
2%94%5%
3.28
Blair Woodward Ayers
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Carol Faracchio
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2019
not enough data
Clare George
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Jacqueline Lomax
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2019
not enough data
Jamie Sandman
26W–19L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Kelly Keifer
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Madellyn Stoner
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2019
not enough data
Mallory Greening
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Sharon Narsiff
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2019
not enough data
Xiaohong Shang
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.