Teams

Rich/Westside

Adult 55 & OVER · 3.0 WOMEN evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-30vs DW Spring M/BWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessie McClary / Suzanne Rich vs Janis Collins / Avery Harrison4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Kelleher / Kristen Iwashchenko vs Allie Chase / Monica Thibodeau6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Sullivan / Beth Foreman vs Kellie Gearhart / Anna Hite6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-23vs DW Spring M/BLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudie Fien-Helfman / Peggy Stovall vs Diane Rohan / MAUREEN Montgomery2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Lifsey / Denise Michaud vs Avery Harrison / Nicole Bouker2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBetsy Williams / Melanie Yaksich vs Janet Colegrove / Kellie Gearhart6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-16vs DW Spring M/BWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Jessie McClary vs Allie Chase / Janis Collins2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKristen Iwashchenko / Ann McDowell vs Anna Hite / Avery Harrison6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Sullivan / Beth Foreman vs Nicole Bouker / Kellie Gearhart6-4, 7-6
2025-04-09vs DW Spring M/BLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Sager / Anne Kelleher vs Diane Rohan / Allie Chase2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessie McClary / Beth Foreman vs Anna Hite / Nicole Bouker3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Michaud / Barbara Lifsey vs Monica Thibodeau / Avery Harrison1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-02vs DW Spring M/BLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Kelleher / Denise Michaud vs Janis Collins / Anna Hite4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessie McClary / Beth Foreman vs Janet Colegrove / Avery Harrison6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelanie Yaksich / Suzanne Rich vs Monica Thibodeau / Allie Chase6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-26vs DW Spring M/BLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Michaud / Wendy Sullivan vs Allie Chase / Diane Rohan6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn McDowell / Jessie McClary vs Janis Collins / Anna Hite2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Stovall / Betsy Williams vs MAUREEN Montgomery / Nicole Bouker1-6, 2-6
2025-03-19vs DW Spring M/BLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Beth Foreman vs Diane Rohan / Allie Chase3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Lifsey / Anne Kelleher vs MAUREEN Montgomery / Monica Thibodeau3-6, 0-6
2025-03-12vs DW Spring M/BLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Foreman / Wendy Sullivan vs Janet Colegrove / Janis Collins1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Iwashchenko / Ann McDowell vs Anna Hite / Avery Harrison4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Michaud / Suzanne Rich vs Allie Chase / MAUREEN Montgomery1-6, 4-6
2025-03-11vs DW Spring M/BLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Williams / Denise Michaud vs MAUREEN Montgomery / Diane Rohan3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Lifsey / Ann McDowell vs Anna Hite / Avery Harrison2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Iwashchenko / Jessie McClary vs Monica Thibodeau / Janis Collins2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Judie Fien-Helfman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Jessie McClary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Denise Michaud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Anne Kelleher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Beth Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Barbara Lifsey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Kristen Iwashchenko
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Ann McDowell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Yaksich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Sager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Stovall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Foreman + Wendy Sullivan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judie Fien-Helfman
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jessie McClary
14W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Denise Michaud
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anne Kelleher
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Beth Foreman
5W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Barbara Lifsey
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Kristen Iwashchenko
12W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Ann McDowell
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Melanie Yaksich
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Elizabeth Sager
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Stovall
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Sullivan
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.