Teams

LHSC-Schoenrock/Westport

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 2.5 Wednesday

11 players · average NTRP 2.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-10-09vs LMRO-Romley/JettonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Franck / Madelyn Palomeque vs Kristi Martin / Kimberly Varshine6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHanna Schoenrock / Caroline Raynor vs Maggie Steel / Chandler Kristy6-3, 6-0
2024-10-08vs LAJA-Jackson/River Run 2.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesAmanda Frank / Bambi Porter vs Jess Slabaugh / Rachel Pastoriza3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarla Deck / Ashley Witherspoon vs Lisa Baker / Amanda Caveney6-0, 6-3
2024-10-02vs LMCA-Cassidy/EdgemoorWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadelyn Palomeque / Caroline Franck vs Erin Pickens / Meg Stacy7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHanna Schoenrock / Donna Turner vs Michelle Cassidy / Sandra Davidson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Greffin / Amanda Frank vs Sheryl Theisen / Melissa Marlowe3-6, 1-6
2024-09-25vs LKGI-Gibson / WestportSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMadelyn Palomeque / Caroline Franck vs Rachel Crane / Wendy Labar4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline Raynor / Hanna Schoenrock vs KJ Gibson / Amanda Matheny6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadelyn Palomeque / Kelly Greffin vs Sarah Fraction / Lindsay Mahoney6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarla Deck / Ashley Witherspoon vs Heather Russo / Stacy Swaney6-0, 6-0
2024-09-11vs LAJA-Jackson/River Run 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesHanna Schoenrock / Caroline Franck vs Crissie Abell / Lisa Baker7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesVeronica Westendorff / Kelly Greffin vs Lauren Conners / Jaime Wilde2-6, 2-6
2024-09-04vs LMRO-Romley/JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadelyn Palomeque / Donna Turner vs Lesa Conroy / Jenny Grantham6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Raynor / Jennifer Estridge vs Akilah Grimes / Katheryn White6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Elliott / Bambi Porter vs Susan Younis / Kate Vose1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-28vs LMCA-Cassidy/EdgemoorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Raynor / Jennifer Elliott vs Emily Spillman / Erin Pickens7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMadelyn Palomeque / Hanna Schoenrock vs Sheryl Theisen / Grace Helmuth5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-21vs LKGI-Gibson / WestportLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Raynor / Carla Deck vs Jackie Wander / JoAnna Kauffman7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHanna Schoenrock / Madelyn Palomeque vs DIANE FIORE / Rachel Crane7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Estridge / Bambi Porter vs Amanda Matheny / Michelle Schmerge6-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesDonna Turner / Caroline Raynor vs Abbie Pedroza / Nancy Hibsch6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMadelyn Palomeque / Caroline Franck vs Gabrielle Parks / Sarah Fraction6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Caroline Raynor
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Madelyn Palomeque
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.78
Jennifer Elliott
published
2.69
Carla Deck
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Hanna Schoenrock
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Donna Turner
published 2.5
2.44
Bambi Porter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.37
Ashley Witherspoon
published 2.5
Caroline Franck
published 2.5
1.97
Kelly Greffin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Taysha Wendt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Raynor + Hanna Schoenrock14854% games−1.0% vs expected
Madelyn Palomeque + Hanna Schoenrock4152% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Elliott + Madelyn Palomeque123 matchesnot enough data
Madelyn Palomeque + Caroline Raynor123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Raynor + Carla Deck213 matchesnot enough data
Carla Deck + Bambi Porter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Raynor
72W–37L career · 12 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Madelyn Palomeque
69W–34L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
Jennifer Elliott
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Carla Deck
78W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Hanna Schoenrock
76W–57L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%17%83%
2.62
2.5
Donna Turner
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Bambi Porter
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Ashley Witherspoon
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Caroline Franck
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Kelly Greffin
12W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Taysha Wendt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.