Teams

Choy

2025 18&Over Fall Non Advancing · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-02vs JhaveriWon 30
W#1 DoublesBradley Hochwald / William Xiang vs Peter Le / Radek Nesnidal6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJordan Chang vs Neil Goodman6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Wang / Andrew Lim vs Amish Jhaveri / Nicholas Tam6-2, 6-4
2025-11-10vs Pham/RosnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesBradley Hochwald / Eduardo Mere vs Robert Pees / Michael Thompson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris Yoo vs Chase Grubman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRJ Bocado / Jeremy Law vs Brian Polen / Kim Long Pham6-4, 6-4
2025-11-03vs CohenWon 21
W#1 DoublesColin Reed / William Xiang vs Manuel Freitas / Andrew Silver6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTeddy Miller vs Griffin Riley5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRJ Bocado / Andrew Lim vs Ron Cohen / Cranston Darris6-0, 6-1
2025-10-30vs TaurWon 21
L#1 DoublesEduardo Mere / William Xiang vs Robert Huang / Fangru Jiang6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Wang vs William Tang6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Velasco / Jeremy Law vs David Taur / Jake Goldstein6-1, 7-5
2025-10-26vs BhagwagarWon 10
W#2 DoublesGaurav Chandra / Alvin Choy vs Christopher Verstegen / Rory Solomon6-1, 6-2
2025-10-22vs Inglorious BackhandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBradley Hochwald / Chris Yoo vs Mikko Tesalona / Felix Hui6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJordan Chang vs Joshua Lappin6-3, 6-5
W#2 DoublesMatthew Velasco / Andrew Lim vs Jon Bachrach / Vikram D'Mello6-3, 7-6
2025-10-14vs Full Metal RacquetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesRJ Bocado / Bradley Hochwald vs Erik Ulin / David Kay7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEduardo Mere vs James Bronstein6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColin Reed / Andrew Lim vs David Sherman / Richard Ha6-3, 7-5
2025-09-29vs JhaveriWon 21
L#1 DoublesColin Reed / William Xiang vs Neil Goodman / Nicholas Tam2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTeddy Miller vs Radek Nesnidal6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Velasco / Jeremy Law vs Sandro Battaglia / David Arney6-2, 6-2
2025-09-21vs JMTA All StarsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRJ Bocado / David Wang vs Dushyant Chadha / Bruce Friedberg6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEduardo Mere vs Joshua Ren6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Velasco / Jeremy Law vs Elliott Smith / Carlos Alvarez Posadilla2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hirsh0751532210
2Bhagwagar0761532218
3Choy0817616174
4Gonzalez/Martinetti0819518193
5Shin0814921184
6Wong/Jordan08121125221
7JMTA All Stars08111330225
8Known Associates0871736248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Chris Yoo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Eduardo Mere
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
William Xiang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Bradley Hochwald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Matthew Velasco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
David Wang
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Colin Reed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Teddy Miller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Jeremy Law
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Alvin Choy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jordan Chang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
RJ Bocado
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Xiang + Colin Reed4164% games+7.8% vs expected
Eduardo Mere + Bradley Hochwald3255% games+0.9% vs expected
Matthew Velasco + Jeremy Law303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Yoo + David Wang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Yoo
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Eduardo Mere
73W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
William Xiang
29W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Bradley Hochwald
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Matthew Velasco
17W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
David Wang
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Colin Reed
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Teddy Miller
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Jeremy Law
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alvin Choy
64W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Jordan Chang
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
RJ Bocado
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.