Teams

BRTC:Court in Session:Spector

2023 EMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
John Sommerstein
published
3.81
Brad Stoll
published 4
3.73
Akito Miyazaki
published 4
3.49
Arthur Queenan
published 4
Frank Sklar
published
Gerald Parker
published
James Caffrey
published
James Waldinger
published
Ken Hodas
published
Mark Botch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Diehl
published
Peter Gaston
published
Peter Goodridge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Philip Freiberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Greif
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Akito Miyazaki + Brad Stoll6655% games+7.6% vs expected
James Waldinger + Mark Botch15561% games+7.1% vs expected
James Caffrey + Arthur Queenan3348% games−4.2% vs expected
Peter Gaston + Peter Goodridge2357% gamesnot enough data
Philip Freiberger + Peter Goodridge224 matchesnot enough data
James Waldinger + Michael Diehl404 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Potter + Mark Botch123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Diehl + Mark Botch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Sommerstein
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Brad Stoll
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Christopher Potter
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Akito Miyazaki
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Arthur Queenan
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
Frank Sklar
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gerald Parker
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Caffrey
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Waldinger
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Hodas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Botch
29W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Diehl
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Gaston
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Goodridge
34W–23L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Philip Freiberger
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Greif
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.