Teams

SKY PINK

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs WP-O BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesJenine Camins vs Cody Galloway2-6, 4-6
2023-05-24vs DTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJenine Camins / Pamela Wandry vs Anna Reed / Amy Land7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-17vs CM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Dewees / Gayle Long vs Jessica Hartigan / Nicole Walsh5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-07vs DTC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Dewees / Kristi Desfosses vs Sarah Auchterlonie / Holly Scott6-2, 6-2
2023-04-26vs WP-O BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Dewees / Sharlene Keithley vs Ashwini Pillai / Suganthi Manonmani6-1, 6-3
2023-04-19vs GAC GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesJessica Dewees vs Betsy Berman6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJenine Camins / Alison Roberts vs Gina Ernst / Anna Reed2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Jennifer Rigsby
published
2.78
Jessica Dewees
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Alison Roberts
published 3
2.75
Sharlene Keithley
published
2.59
Gayle Long
published
2.34
Pamela Wandry
published
2.26
Kristi Desfosses
published
Candace Kristensson
published 2.5
2.12
Erin Gray
published
2.10
Jenine Camins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gayle Long + Jennifer Rigsby5161% games+9.2% vs expected
Jessica Dewees + Gayle Long134 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Desfosses + Pamela Wandry123 matchesnot enough data
Sharlene Keithley + Jessica Dewees213 matchesnot enough data
Sharlene Keithley + Gayle Long033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Rigsby
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Jessica Dewees
70W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alison Roberts
12W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharlene Keithley
21W–29L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
Gayle Long
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
Pamela Wandry
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
Kristi Desfosses
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Candace Kristensson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erin Gray
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Jenine Camins
39W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.