Teams

Tran/FS/CM

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-28vs Marcotte/FS/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephen Weeks / Dzung Vu vs Nathan Marcotte / Sam Hanna6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDon Praphan / Arpan Pallar vs Brandon Richmond / Mitchell Spradlin6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJackson Cervantes vs Jon Ubbenga6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-28vs Divakaruni/Bentonville/KTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Buescher / Diem Tran vs Shashikanth Divakaruni / SIVA SANKAR BACHANABOYANA6-0, 6-2
2025-05-22vs Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRCWon 10
W#3 DoublesSamuel Musser / Diem Tran vs Daniel Short / Stan Rodgers7-6, 6-4
2025-05-18vs Marcotte/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiem Tran / Britt Mounce vs Brandon Richmond / Nathan Marcotte5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackson Cervantes / Patrick Meador vs Sam Hanna / Mark Hoskyn6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDon Praphan vs Joshua Kilgore5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Marcotte/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesArpan Pallar / Diem Tran vs Matt Marshall / Michael Barr6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMorris Rajsombath vs Jon Ubbenga6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDzung Vu / Hung Nguyen vs Joshua Kilgore / Nathan Marcotte6-3, 6-2
2025-04-06vs Marcotte/FS/CMWon 40
W#1 DoublesArpan Pallar / Patrick Meador vs David Humphrey / Joshua Kilgore6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRyder MacK vs Nathan Marcotte3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHung Nguyen / Dzung Vu vs Brandon Richmond / Mark Hoskyn6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiem Tran / Britt Mounce vs Matt Marshall / Michael Barr3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Patrick Meador
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Arpan Pallar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Don Praphan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.64
Jackson Cervantes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Diem Tran
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Dzung Vu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Britt Mounce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Morris Rajsombath
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ryder MacK
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Stephen Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Meador
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Arpan Pallar
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Don Praphan
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jackson Cervantes
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Diem Tran
11W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dzung Vu
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Britt Mounce
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morris Rajsombath
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ryder MacK
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Weeks
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.