Teams

BIR GIANCOTTI

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.56 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cori Bryan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Julie Baugh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.51
Shawna Maginniss
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Barbarita Nieri
published 3.5
3.32
REBECCA BONEAU
published
3.32
Jacqueline Brown
published 3.5
3.28
Rhonda Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Karen Maggi
published
3.26
Emily Navarro
published 3.5
Annette Hanson
published 3.5
Bethany Peabody
published 3.5
JULIE ANDREWS
published 3.5
3.24
Laura Spears
published
3.21
Marcela Romero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Danielle Woods
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Lynn Carlson
published
3.16
Paige Whitmire
published
3.14
Kathy Ewen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.02
Kylie Giancotti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Whitmire + Julie Baugh5066% games+5.1% vs expected
Laura Spears + Barbarita Nieri8650% games+2.1% vs expected
Lynn Carlson + Jacqueline Brown7257% games+1.1% vs expected
Karen Maggi + Kathy Ewen5455% games+0.2% vs expected
Kylie Giancotti + Jacqueline Brown3254% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Harmon + Barbarita Nieri224 matchesnot enough data
REBECCA BONEAU + Julie Baugh224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Spears + Paige Whitmire213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cori Bryan
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Baugh
51W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Shawna Maginniss
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Barbarita Nieri
31W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
REBECCA BONEAU
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Jacqueline Brown
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Rhonda Harmon
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Karen Maggi
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Emily Navarro
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Annette Hanson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bethany Peabody
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
JULIE ANDREWS
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Spears
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Marcela Romero
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Danielle Woods
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Lynn Carlson
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Paige Whitmire
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Kathy Ewen
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kylie Giancotti
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.