Teams

Seminole Lake Price

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-10vs ELW FriesLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristine Price / Frances Parker vs Amy Burns / Noela Fries2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDebi Billington / Cindy Kobeda vs Martha Cornatzer / Stacey Castellini2-6, 2-6
2023-06-03vs Belleair Del BassoLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Price / Jayne Lewis vs Shannon Connolly / Dorothy Rizzo3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-20vs Pinellas/Cregann/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaggie Berning / Cindy Kobeda vs Harriet Cregann / Anne Remie0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-13vs Tarpon HellmersLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Price / Jayne Lewis vs Elise Hall / Joan Johnson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-06vs Seminole Lake KelseyLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Blush / Christine Price vs Rachel Karioki / Sherrl Fry2-6, 1-6
2023-04-29vs ELW FriesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJayne Lewis / Christine Price vs Kathleen Annichiarico / Amy Burns7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrances Parker / Debi Billington vs Noella Burgeson / Stacey Castellini0-6, 0-6
2023-04-15vs Pinellas/Cregann/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Price / Sally Blush vs Trisha Shirkey / Jill MacNeil0-6, 1-6
2023-04-08vs Tarpon HellmersLost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Jani Parrish6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-01vs Seminole Lake KelseyWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Price / Sally Blush vs Kristen Shinners / Elisabeth Leitner6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Moise Carrington
published 3.5
3.14
January Moennig
published
3.11
Sally Blush
published
3.08
Sue Francis
published
3.06
Kristen Pierce
published
3.02
Maggie Berning
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.01
Christine Price
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.99
Kim Poynter
published
2.91
Debi Billington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jayne Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Berning + Christine Price314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Moise Carrington
67W–71L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
January Moennig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sue Francis
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
Kristen Pierce
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Maggie Berning
50W–40L career · 8 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 7 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kim Poynter
31W–15L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Debi Billington
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jayne Lewis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.