Teams

CPAcers

Adult Team Tennis · 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0

26 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Gibbes
published 4.5
3.92
Tami Jann
published
3.66
Sarah Hickman
published
3.43
Alexander Arnold
published 4
3.33
Ivy Burdick
published 3.5
3.30
Bradley Ungvarsky
published 3.5
3.24
Dave Bogan
published 3.5
3.24
Jack Abernathy
published 3.5
3.17
Daniel Studenc
published 3.5
3.13
Traci Burke
published
3.09
Amy Abernathy
published 3.5
3.04
Scott Jennings
published
2.99
Alene Deloach
published 3.5
2.73
Harriet Starkey
published 3
2.56
Susan Ramsey
published
Jan Ghys
published
Jennifer Witmer
published
Lena Sells
published
Lori Tyson
published
Melanie Beckler
published
Michael Burke
published
Pamela Scheer
published
Patti Gilchrist
published
Renee Head
published
Steve Wood
published
Timothy Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Gibbes + Jennifer Witmer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Gibbes
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tami Jann
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Sarah Hickman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Alexander Arnold
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Ivy Burdick
14W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Bradley Ungvarsky
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dave Bogan
26W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jack Abernathy
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Daniel Studenc
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
Traci Burke
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amy Abernathy
17W–48L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
Scott Jennings
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Alene Deloach
37W–79L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Harriet Starkey
32W–31L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan Ramsey
16W–56L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jan Ghys
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Witmer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lena Sells
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Tyson
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Beckler
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Burke
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Scheer
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patti Gilchrist
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Head
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Wood
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Ryan
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.