← Teams

VTC-Mills

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lorna Goth
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
—
Denise Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Janet Mills
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Porter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Annie Sumpter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Julie Gorecki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-11-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / Tina Clancy vs Garrene Mcgale / Amy Patton6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Kelley Gaylor vs Sarah Mutal / Mary Priester6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Trylla Lembke vs Dar Dragoon / Sheryl Riley7-5, 6-4
2023-11-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / Rochelle Pluymers vs Judy Hamilton / Carol Robertson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Louanne Fuller vs TERESA LAWHEAD / Janet Dowty7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Lagielski / Annie Sumpter vs Anne Milan / Peg McClendon6-3, 6-3
2023-10-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Kelley Gaylor vs Kimberly Lanier / Adrienne VanBeckhoven4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Gorecki / Dayna Porter vs Patricia Brink / Pam Freier6-3, 6-0
2023-10-21Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJanet Mills / Rochelle Pluymers vs Michele O'Brien / Paula Watt7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDayna Porter / Julie Gorecki vs Michelle Jordan / Nicole Vedder6-2, 6-0
2023-10-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / Janet Mills vs Sharon McCoy / Gena Martinez6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLorna Goth / Kelley Gaylor vs Julie Bradford / Christine Bennett-Hanes4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Lagielski / Annie Sumpter vs Nenette Olson / Maryann Velez6-4, 7-5
2023-10-01Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJanet Mills / Denise Dawkins vs Kelly Norling / Traci Laurent6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLorna Goth / Julie Gorecki vs Laurie Sykes / Heather Selis6-1, 6-0
2023-09-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Trylla Lembke vs Sammie Sue Willenborg / Lisa Wisthoff6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDayna Porter / Denise Dawkins vs Erin Thole / Marlene Enos6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Mills / Rochelle Pluymers vs Christine Taylor / Karen Groenweghe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJanet Mills / Dayna Porter vs Crystal Miller / Andrea Vicino6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnnie Sumpter / Pamela Lagielski vs Stephanie Arnheim / Jackie Konen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLouanne Fuller / Teresa Darling vs Hideko Kershaw / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Lorna Goth
124W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.77
3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
3.5
Denise Dawkins
59W–54L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Janet Mills
66W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Annie Sumpter
22W–43L career
6%94%0%
3.16
3.5
Julie Gorecki
33W–22L career
11%89%0%
3.15
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.