Teams

NNM 3.5W SV - Woolcott

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over League - NNM · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-02vs NNM 3.5W STC - OntiverosLost 13
W#1 DoublesJen Woolcott / Beth Birky vs Monica Ontiveros / Anna Montoya6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMonique Archuleta vs Karen Ryan5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Grado / Angie Dawson vs Jamie Blosser / Kaori Hoffman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEvangeline Trujillo / Diana Russell vs Marianne Dwight / Michele Plourde4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-26vs NNM 3.5W CC - UlibarriLost 13
L#1 DoublesGina Hulick / Louise Palomo vs Kim Lerohl / Anna O'Connell5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Birky vs Sahreem Luergan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanet Grado / Angie Dawson vs Quiana Salazar-King / Carol Vencill3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJen Woolcott / Kimberly Nguyen vs Elizabeth McGuire / Kim Lovedahl6-1, 6-4
2022-03-20vs NNM 3.5W Tanoan - SedberrySplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeth Birky / Dottie Anastasi vs Lisa Sly / Lisa Denning6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTheresa Trujillo vs Ann Liem1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Love / Elizabeth Goodwin vs Monette Sedberry / Jessica Carter6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Sheila Delelles vs Lucinda O'Nuska / Amy Matteucci1-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs NNM 3.5W HP - JamesLost 13
L#1 DoublesDottie Anastasi / Angie Dawson vs Dina Austin / Monica Davis2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMonique Archuleta vs Rae Woods6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Trujillo / Gina Hulick vs Diane Cloud / Jo Ann Erikson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Goodwin / Diana Russell vs Anna DeRosa / Susan Miller0-6, 2-6
2022-03-13vs NNM 3.5W CC - UlibarriSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSylvia Trujillo / Beth Birky vs Quiana Salazar-King / Kammie Kruse5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMonique Archuleta vs Carol Vencill6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLouise Palomo / Elizabeth Goodwin vs Aimee Richardson-Zadra / Nadine Waslosky1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKellye Rogers / Sheila Delelles vs Elizabeth Fleddermann / Kim Lerohl3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-12vs NNM 3.5W TCA - LynnLost 13
W#1 DoublesDottie Anastasi / Beth Birky vs Jeanne Woodfin / Jennifer Graham7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMonique Archuleta vs Dee Burton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Dawson / Laura Love vs Lori Addison King / Lisa Burckel5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Trujillo / Evangeline Trujillo vs Myra Herrmann / Monica Chewiwie-Otero3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-01vs NNM 3.5W HP - JamesSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGina Hulick / Louise Palomo vs Teresa Kapes / Dina Austin0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMonique Archuleta vs Rae Woods6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJen Woolcott / Sylvia Trujillo vs Diane Cloud / Monica Davis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKellye Rogers / Kimberly Nguyen vs Donna Brennan / Anna DeRosa6-4, 6-1
2022-02-27vs NNM 3.5W Tanoan - SedberryWon 40
W#1 DoublesJen Woolcott / Sylvia Trujillo vs Lisa Sly / Jane Depper6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Birky vs Cindy Hernandez-Wall6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGina Hulick / Louise Palomo vs Jessica Carter / Sarah Baca7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Grado / Angie Dawson vs Monette Sedberry / Lucinda O'Nuska6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Fotieo8026619216
2NNM 3.5W HP - James62181433295
3NNM 3.5W Lobo Club - Hwang53201233298
4NNM 3.5W CC - Ulibarri53171535282
5NNM 3.5W TCA - Lynn53181441328
6NNM 3.5W SV - Ogden44171534263
7NNM 3.5W STC - Ontiveros44151743324
8NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Sedberry35141841332
9NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Luehring35122043293
10NNM 3.5W SV - Woolcott17141841324
11NNM 3.5W HP - Holley0852756364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jen Woolcott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Dottie Anastasi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Gina Hulick
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Beth Birky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Sylvia Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Kellye Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sheila Delelles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Diana Russell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angie Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Evangeline Trujillo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Grado
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Barrett
published
Kimberly Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Laura Love
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Palomo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Monique Archuleta
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Theresa Trujillo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Trujillo + Kellye Rogers6173% games+9.2% vs expected
Gina Hulick + Sylvia Trujillo12958% games+7.1% vs expected
Dottie Anastasi + Beth Birky15358% games+4.3% vs expected
Sylvia Trujillo + Beth Birky111153% games+3.1% vs expected
Sylvia Trujillo + Kellye Rogers3255% games+2.8% vs expected
Sylvia Trujillo + Jen Woolcott221454% games+1.8% vs expected
Sylvia Trujillo + Louise Palomo4163% games+1.2% vs expected
Dottie Anastasi + Sylvia Trujillo301755% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jen Woolcott
141W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Dottie Anastasi
93W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Goodwin
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gina Hulick
73W–75L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Beth Birky
64W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Sylvia Trujillo
126W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kellye Rogers
67W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Sheila Delelles
46W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Diana Russell
50W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Angie Dawson
29W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Evangeline Trujillo
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Grado
24W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Barrett
12W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Nguyen
48W–19L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Love
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Louise Palomo
54W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monique Archuleta
58W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Theresa Trujillo
57W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.