Teams

LS:McAuliffe

2025 ECT Adult 65 & Over Women · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-08vs OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'NeilWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Dibacco / Nancy Javor vs Diana Caty / Graziana Weill6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary-Anne Topulos / Karen Eller vs Nancy Inglese / Barbara Frisbie7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Sullivan / Kathleen Kenyon vs Mary O'Neil / Carolyn Caldwell6-3, 6-2
2025-07-01vs OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'NeilLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Mc Auliffe / Nancy Javor vs Polly Edwards / Mary O'Neil4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary-Anne Topulos / Karen Eller vs Graziana Weill / Mary Barnes6-7, 1-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Fox-Robertson / Lisa Dibacco vs Kathy Pavelcak / Robin Batchelder0-6, 5-7
2025-06-17vs OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'NeilLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Eller / Mary-Anne Topulos vs Graziana Weill / Diana Caty2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Ellen Mooney / Suzanne Mc Auliffe vs Polly Edwards / Mary Barnes2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKarin Fisher / Kathleen Kenyon vs Connie Hurtt / Roisin MacKey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-27vs OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'NeilLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Eller / Mary-Anne Topulos vs Barbara Frisbie / Nancy Inglese7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Mc Auliffe / Lisa Dibacco vs Diana Caty / Graziana Weill4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen Mooney / Cathy Landers vs Mary O'Neil / Polly Edwards0-6, 1-6
2025-05-20vs OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'NeilWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Mc Auliffe / Nancy Javor vs Mary Barnes / Barbara Frisbie6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Eller / Mary-Anne Topulos vs Mary O'Neil / Robin Batchelder6-3, 5-5
L#3 DoublesDonna Sullivan / Cathy Landers vs Connie Hurtt / Roisin MacKey4-6, 4-6
2025-05-13vs OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'NeilWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Mc Auliffe / Karen Eller vs Graziana Weill / Diana Caty0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Dibacco / Mary-Anne Topulos vs Kathy Pavelcak / Nancy Inglese6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Fox-Robertson / Karin Fisher vs Rebecca Coffey / Carolyn Caldwell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OSRC:Shore Shots:Pavelcak/O'Neil0610816144
2LS:McAuliffe0681021173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Nancy Javor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Karin Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Karen Eller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Kathleen Kenyon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Suzanne Mc Auliffe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Mary Ellen Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Cathy Landers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Donna Sullivan
published 3.5
3.22
Carolyn Fox-Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Colleen Sullivan
published 3.5
Lisa Dibacco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary-Anne Topulos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Eller + Mary Ellen Mooney131148% games+1.8% vs expected
Suzanne Mc Auliffe + Mary Ellen Mooney81346% games−2.0% vs expected
Suzanne Mc Auliffe + Karen Eller275243% games−2.7% vs expected
Karin Fisher + Cathy Landers111251% games−2.8% vs expected
Karen Eller + Lisa Dibacco3350% games−4.0% vs expected
Suzanne Mc Auliffe + Lisa Dibacco61242% games−8.9% vs expected
Carolyn Fox-Robertson + Cathy Landers3441% games−11.9% vs expected
Karen Eller + Mary-Anne Topulos2544% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Javor
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
Karin Fisher
22W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
Karen Eller
146W–206L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kathleen Kenyon
43W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Suzanne Mc Auliffe
111W–172L career · 5 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
Mary Ellen Mooney
67W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cathy Landers
48W–48L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donna Sullivan
11W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Fox-Robertson
17W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Colleen Sullivan
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lisa Dibacco
68W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Anne Topulos
26W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.