Teams

Indian Hills (Leslie Bates)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

19 players · average NTRP 3.79 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Leslie Bates
published
3.88
3.83
Ashley Mangine
published 4
3.80
Elizabeth Coffey
published
3.79
Dee Johnson
published 4
3.77
Erica Jansen
published
3.72
Michelle Camay
published
3.71
Annemarie Marold
published 4
3.65
Kerri Grant
published
3.53
Patty Donnalley
published
3.49
Christy Helms
published 4
3.48
Kristin Shaw
published
3.46
Mimi McFall
published
3.45
Allison Thompson
published 3.5
3.41
Melanie Erwin
published
3.35
Bonnie Capsuto
published 3.5
3.34
Angie Arsenault
published 3.5
Elizabeth Riddle
published
Ellen Katz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherridan Santivanez + Erica Jansen14456% games+5.7% vs expected
Patty Donnalley + Allison Thompson0739% games+4.5% vs expected
Kerri Grant + Ashley Mangine101051% games+3.9% vs expected
Erica Jansen + Mimi McFall1439% games−13.2% vs expected
Patty Donnalley + Mimi McFall1535% games−15.8% vs expected
Sherridan Santivanez + Ashley Mangine314 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Shaw + Elizabeth Riddle134 matchesnot enough data
Allison Thompson + Annemarie Marold224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Bates
26W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Sherridan Santivanez
30W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Ashley Mangine
23W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Elizabeth Coffey
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Dee Johnson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Erica Jansen
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Michelle Camay
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Annemarie Marold
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Kerri Grant
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Patty Donnalley
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Christy Helms
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Kristin Shaw
17W–51L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Mimi McFall
16W–26L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Allison Thompson
22W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Melanie Erwin
19W–27L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Bonnie Capsuto
19W–35L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Angie Arsenault
8W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Elizabeth Riddle
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ellen Katz
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.