Teams

LCTA18/Yonce/CCC

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 3.0 - Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 3.0 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Meredith Sharma
published
Chrissie Batten
published 3.5
3.12
Mettrie Lari
published
3.07
Mollie Meares
published
3.06
Cate Leatherman
published 3
2.99
Megan Mozingo
published
2.95
Katie Seaman
published
2.75
Elizabeth Settle
published 3
Ashley Rawl
published 3
2.66
Deborah Looper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Joy Yonce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Mozingo + Cate Leatherman14368% games+12.2% vs expected
Mollie Meares + Megan Mozingo8363% games+10.0% vs expected
Megan Mozingo + Felice Viguerie Killian7163% games+8.0% vs expected
Felice Viguerie Killian + Cate Leatherman9658% games+7.3% vs expected
Megan Mozingo + Chrissie Batten7460% games+5.5% vs expected
Mollie Meares + Felice Viguerie Killian13257% games+3.9% vs expected
Chrissie Batten + Felice Viguerie Killian3344% games−13.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Settle + Joy Yonce224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Sharma
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Chrissie Batten
21W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mettrie Lari
34W–20L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mollie Meares
33W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Cate Leatherman
36W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
Megan Mozingo
54W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
Katie Seaman
39W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Felice Viguerie Killian
41W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Elizabeth Settle
36W–45L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Ashley Rawl
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Deborah Looper
23W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Joy Yonce
31W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.