Teams

Weber/Farmington/FAC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-18vs Bertram/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesSarah Bright vs Gretchen Pharis7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMolly Himes vs Becca Bertram7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKjersti Carpenter vs Leslie Copeland2-6, 6-7
2024-12-12vs Snell/Rogers/MRCWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Tarnasky vs Natalie Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMolly Himes vs Emma Slone6-1, 6-1
2024-11-24vs Snell/Rogers/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Tarnasky vs Natalie Anderson6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSarah Bright vs Hattie Kurin6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKjersti Carpenter vs Brittani Hradsky1-6, 1-6
2024-11-13vs McLaughlin-Chrenka/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Tarnasky vs Laurel Schley2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCallie Brannon vs Nur Kamilah Chrenka4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-03vs Bertram/Fayetteville/SRCWon 10
W#1 SinglesCallie Brannon vs Maria Rene Arandia Jimenez6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sarah Bright
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Jennifer Tarnasky
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Callie Brannon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Molly Himes
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Kjersti Carpenter
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Lyndsey Weber
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bright
41W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jennifer Tarnasky
21W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Callie Brannon
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Molly Himes
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Kjersti Carpenter
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lyndsey Weber
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.