Teams

Polk/Bentonville/IND

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 5.0 Men - Local League at State

8 players · average NTRP 4.88 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs Guy/RR/TexarkanaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanny Polk / Eddie Hunter vs Trent Brandon / Cole Guy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPatrick Wildman vs Samuel Moore6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAdam Attas / Justin Stohlton vs Jake Bridges / Sebastian Romanos-garzon2-6, 4-6
2026-05-17vs Makris/LR/CCLRLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Wildman / Ralf Humbert vs Andrew Conover / Bishop Bass6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDanny Polk vs John Makris6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdmund Hui / Yoshihisa Fujii vs Jesse Ponwith / Grant Jones2-6, 5-7
2026-05-16vs Makris/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 DoublesEddie Hunter / Adam Attas vs Andrew Conover / Chris Nosari3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDanny Polk vs Jesse Ponwith6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRalf Humbert / Yoshihisa Fujii vs John Makris / Grant Jones2-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs Guy/RR/TexarkanaLost 12
L#1 DoublesEddie Hunter / Edmund Hui vs Jake Bridges / Sebastian Romanos-garzon2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPatrick Wildman vs Ivan Michelli6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDanny Polk / Justin Stohlton vs Cole Guy / Samuel Moore4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men - Local League at State
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Guy/RR/Texarkana317513113
2Polk/Bentonville/IND043919113

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.13
Patrick Wildman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Adam Attas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.73
Danny Polk
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.60
Eddie Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Edmund Hui
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Justin Stohlton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ralf Humbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Yoshihisa Fujii
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Wildman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
5.13
5
Adam Attas
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Danny Polk
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.73
5
Eddie Hunter
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.60
4.5
Edmund Hui
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
4.48
Justin Stohlton
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ralf Humbert
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yoshihisa Fujii
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.