← Teams

TLTC Schacht

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

1 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
James Schacht
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Results9 ties
2019-08-24Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesJames Schacht vs Daryl Brown6-2, 7-5
2019-08-24Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesJames Schacht vs Yadong Li6-2, 6-2
2019-08-23Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJames Schacht / Christopher Kradjan vs Calvin Vu / Yi Sun6-0, 6-1
2019-03-30Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJames Schacht / Lew Napolitano vs James Coyne / Bruce Garrison6-1, 6-1
2019-03-09Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJames Schacht / Mark Mathews vs Michael Taft / Robert Johnston4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-03-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKevin McDonough / James Schacht vs Ted Bailey / Angel Mercado6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2019-02-24Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJames Schacht / Mark Lindquist vs David Maltman / Andrew Kapust5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2019-01-13Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJames Schacht / Mark Mathews vs Wayne Mazikowski / Mike Watson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2019-01-06Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBrian Cochran / James Schacht vs Mike Shaffer / Ron Moblo6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
James Schacht
42W–67L career
5%91%5%
2.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.