Teams

BBTC - Matthews

2025 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-16Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAnnabella Matthews vs Kelly Robinson2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJordan Herrington vs Jennifer Mitchell0-6, 0-6
2025-12-08vs SRYC - DiSantiLost 02
L#1 SinglesAna Hebert vs Stephenie Baker0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMarlo Stewart vs Lacey Paquin0-6, 0-6
2025-11-24vs SRYC - DiSantiLost 03
L#1 SinglesMarlo Stewart vs Madison Ward0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesElan Buckley vs Lacey Paquin1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTyler Ash vs Stephenie Baker1-6, 1-6
2025-11-18vs Mitchell TOCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesElan Buckley vs Hillary Mathis1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMarlo Stewart vs Billie Macnaughton3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAnnabella Matthews vs Sarah Mitchener2-6, 1-6
2025-11-17vs Gartman - BiloxiLost 03
L#1 SinglesElan Buckley vs Sarah Craddock0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Ash vs Kelly Robinson3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAnnabella Matthews vs Jennifer Mitchell1-6, 0-6
2025-11-04vs Gartman - BiloxiLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnn Strange vs Janet Blythe2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesClaire Hanson vs Kelly Robinson3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJordan Herrington vs Rebecca Atchison1-6, 2-6
2025-10-27vs Mitchell TOCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesElan Buckley vs Katherine Swetman2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAna Hebert vs Ashley Gunn3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJordan Herrington vs Holly French0-6, 2-6
2025-10-23vs SRYC - DiSantiLost 03
L#1 SinglesAna Hebert vs Katy Boyer2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesClaire Hanson vs Madison Ward0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMarlo Stewart vs Stephanie Chapman0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mitchell TOCC35121225200
2BBTC - Matthews0802448288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.27
Elan Buckley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Claire Hanson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Tyler Ash
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
1.93
Annabella Matthews
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.88
Jordan Herrington
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
1.86
Ana Hebert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.85
Ann Strange
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
1.81
Marlo Stewart
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Elan Buckley
19W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Claire Hanson
4W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Ash
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Annabella Matthews
10W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Jordan Herrington
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
2.5
Ana Hebert
0W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
2.5
Ann Strange
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Marlo Stewart
3W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.