Teams

SFT:Spark White:Sideman

2025 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.41 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-24vs SFT:Spark Red:Schiela/LambertLost 14
L#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Debora Lunt vs Beth Humberd / Laura Rubin2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Michele Chicoine6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCassia Burns / Chloe Burns vs Colene Nardone / Jolene Buttress7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTeresa Colena vs Gillian Baudreau4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArantxa Lewis / Jianping Chevalier vs Lynnell Schiela / Donna Arnold2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-17vs SFT:Spark Green:BarryLost 05
L#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Elizabeth Egan vs Kelly O'Connor / Dalia Paradie4-6, 5-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Alexandra Warren6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesArantxa Lewis / Debora Lunt vs Victoria Dowling / Jane Sances3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTeresa Colena vs Haley Gustafson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCassia Burns / Chloe Burns vs Bridget MacMillan / Chelsie Foster3-6, 4-6
2025-07-10vs IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/EvansWon 32
W#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Elizabeth Egan vs Caitlin Doran-Serafino / Melanie Gustus6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Ellen McKenna5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Rudnicki / Janet Smith vs Noelle Statires / Amanda Gallagher6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesTeresa Colena vs K Hunt4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDebora Lunt / Jaime Burns vs Jennifer Bell / Kristin Kissane6-3, 6-2
2025-06-19vs MAC:Manchester Red:WickLost 04
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Egan / JOLENE JOHNSON vs Laura Carrigan / Nikki Tierney4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesArantxa Lewis / Janet Smith vs Christina Gregory / Jayne Rice1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTeresa Colena vs Christine Woodman1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Rudnicki / Debora Lunt vs Lexi Scott / Alexandra Taussig6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-12vs SFT:Spark Green:BarryLost 05
L#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Ava Czarnota vs Patty Barry / Mary D'Aoust1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Haley Gustafson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebora Lunt / Arantxa Lewis vs Marlo Devir / Dalia Paradie4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTeresa Colena vs Alexandra Warren0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCassia Burns / Chloe Burns vs Bridget MacMillan / Chelsie Foster4-6, 4-6
2025-06-05vs IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/EvansWon 31
L#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Debora Lunt vs Ellen McKenna / Abigail Edelmann6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Melanie Gustus3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Smith / Arantxa Lewis vs Caitlin Doran-Serafino / Amanda Gallagher6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJaime Burns / Chloe Burns vs Kristin Kissane / Noelle Statires5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-22vs SFT:Spark Red:Schiela/LambertLost 23
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Egan / Aricia Symes-Elmer vs Laura Rubin / Taylor Sullivan6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Beth Humberd6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebora Lunt / Karen Rudnicki vs Lynnell Schiela / Julie Petros6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTeresa Colena vs Gillian Baudreau6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCassia Burns / Chloe Burns vs Dana Malloy / Colene Nardone4-6, 4-6
2025-05-15vs MAC:Manchester Red:WickWon 21
W#1 DoublesJOLENE JOHNSON / Elizabeth Egan vs Michelle Ellis / Meredith Flynn-Ripley7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrea Arena vs Ruzanna Queenan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChloe Burns / Jaime Burns vs Alexandra Taussig / Lexi Scott3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NETC:Slay Sisters:Rogers0621922221
2WESF:Set2Play:Weisenbloom/Mateeva06201025206
3MLTC:Love Hurts:Dwyer/Zukowski0642653332
4WOB:Aces:Hoffman/Calleva0833719293
5LAK:Casual Sets:Kimball0833721253
6SFT:Spark Red:Schiela/Lambert08281231320
7BRTC:One Hit Wonders:Prestero08261436313
8CED:Cedardale Green:Moore08261437333
9W109:Sets in the City:DiVincenzo/Klein08241637320
10WOB:Woburn Green:Hou08211940306
11LTC:Lexington TC:Weidman/Miller08221842359
12MAC:Manchester Red:Wick08192144338
13BGTC:Holly B:Blum08202046386
14W109:Racq Pack:Broderick/Patel08221846352
15LFW:Set Winners:Williams/Fordiani08211947329
16LFNT:Fireballs:Denisova/Broderick08182250364
17WTC:Winchester:Campana08162453374
18NEW:Overserved:Colcord/Zizza08172354379
19KIG:Capys:Sampson/Connerly08152555400
20STC:Sportsmen's:Coppola/Cutter08152556378
21SFT:Spark White:Sideman08122859416
22LAK:Lakeville Aces:DiPalma/Miguel08122860390
23MAC:Manchester Blue:Twombly08112961422
24IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans0883268450
25WOB:The A Team:Ross/Lee0883269433
26WEY:Weymouth:Neelon09291635309
27WEY:Weymouth:Eckhoff09232252404
28SSY:TNT/Smith09222353411
29SSY:SSYMCA:LeFevre09162963422

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Evan Sideman
published 4.5
Elizabeth Egan
published 4
3.39
Andrea Arena
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.29
JOLENE JOHNSON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aricia Symes-Elmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Janet Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Ava Czarnota
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Teresa Colena
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Cassia Burns
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Chloe Burns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Debora Lunt
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Arantxa Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.72
Karen Rudnicki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.71
Jaime Burns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassia Burns + Chloe Burns044 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Burns + Cassia Burns123 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Burns + Chloe Burns123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Evan Sideman
75W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
4
Elizabeth Egan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Arena
63W–53L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
JOLENE JOHNSON
157W–107L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Aricia Symes-Elmer
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janet Smith
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Ava Czarnota
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
Teresa Colena
106W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Cassia Burns
19W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Chloe Burns
2W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Debora Lunt
28W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Arantxa Lewis
2W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Rudnicki
15W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Jaime Burns
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.