Teams

SFV Baby Got Backhand

2023 Adult 40+ SFV Winter · SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesWangie Pineda / Robin Stewart vs Nancy Kong / Hedy Mohtashami6-0, 6-1
2023-03-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesWangie Pineda / Robin Stewart vs DENISE GICK / Nicole Sokolow3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-05vs SFV Aces WildLost 01
L#3 DoublesWangie Pineda / Sarah Distad vs Liz Cackowski / Kimberley Walker1-6, 3-6
2023-01-08vs SFV Love 2 AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesWangie Pineda / Robin Stewart vs Tricia Kim / September Ryken4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Karen Watts
published
3.25
Sara Gabriel
published
3.23
Cheryl Hughart
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Wangie Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristine Puno
published
3.08
Leslie Giammanco
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Julie Arshonsky
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.84
Deborah Anderson
published 3
Julianne Wood
published
Manuela Marino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Giammanco + Wangie Pineda4449% games−3.6% vs expected
Cheryl Hughart + Wangie Pineda7554% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Hughart + Leslie Giammanco3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Watts
83W–43L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Sara Gabriel
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cheryl Hughart
121W–97L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Wangie Pineda
96W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristine Puno
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Leslie Giammanco
88W–83L career · 8 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Julie Arshonsky
130W–102L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Deborah Anderson
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Julianne Wood
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Manuela Marino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.