Teams

AK-TAC-Korshin

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2026-03-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / Catherine Stone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28vs FUN CREWWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Catherine Stone vs Lori Kaltenbach / Joe Buckwalter6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDenise Henderson / Anthony Brooks vs Douglas Henie / Conita Mullett6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAntonio Monterrosa / Lucille Abe vs Christie Wyzykowski / Fred Lief6-4, 6-3
2026-02-28vs Team 7Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAntonio Monterrosa / Lucille Abe vs John Carlson / Julie Raymond-Yakoubian3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilly Stone / Catherine Stone vs Dana Griffin / Bryan Martin6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Anthony Brooks vs Stacia Green / Daniel Whitfield1-6, 2-6
2026-02-15vs FUN CREWWon 20
W#1 DoublesAntonio Monterrosa / Lucille Abe vs Fred Lief / Cynthia Henie6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Patrick Rumley vs Christie Wyzykowski / Douglas Bliss6-2, 6-2
2026-02-13vs OatWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Stone / Phu Ngo vs Linda Westwick / Ryan Jaramillo6-4, 6-4
2026-02-08vs Team 7Won 21
L#1 DoublesAntonio Monterrosa / Lucille Abe vs Daniel Whitfield / Stacia Green5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWilly Stone / Catherine Stone vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian / Jay Green6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Anthony Brooks vs Marlys Morton / Adam Choi7-5, 6-2
2026-02-07vs Team 8’ersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Stone / Phu Ngo vs NIcholas Rothman / Karen Loeffler6-1, 6-0
2026-02-01vs OatLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / Catherine Stone vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Linda Westwick2-6, 4-6
2026-01-31vs FUN CREWWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Catherine Stone vs Conita Mullett / Joe Buckwalter6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLucille Abe / Antonio Monterrosa vs Douglas Henie / Cynthia Henie6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesApril Korshin / Patrick Rumley vs Douglas Bliss / Susan Brunner7-6, 7-5
2026-01-24vs OatWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Allen Clendaniel vs Lucille Abe / Jeremy Conkling6-1, 6-1
2026-01-23vs Team 7Won 21
W#1 DoublesAntonio Monterrosa / Kima Kimura vs Dana Griffin / Bryan Martin6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Willy Stone vs Daniel Whitfield / Triin Minton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Henderson / Patrick Rumley vs Marlys Morton / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-17vs Team 8’ersWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Allen Clendaniel vs Bryan Martin / Triin Minton6-2, 6-0
2026-01-10vs Team 7Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Denise Henderson vs Triin Minton / Bryan Martin5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Rumley / ELIZE Rumley vs Stacia Green / Daniel Whitfield2-6, 1-6
2026-01-10vs FUN CREWSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Denise Henderson vs Lori Kaltenbach / Joe Buckwalter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Patrick Rumley vs Christie Wyzykowski / Eric Jostsons6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Catherine Stone
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.81
April Korshin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
ELIZE Rumley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.66
Lucille Abe
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Denise Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.58
Kima Kimura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Anthony Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Antonio Monterrosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Patrick Rumley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stone + Willy Stone21858% games+13.8% vs expected
Patrick Rumley + ELIZE Rumley71051% games−1.9% vs expected
Antonio Monterrosa + Lucille Abe5353% games−2.9% vs expected
April Korshin + Anthony Brooks4648% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Brooks + ELIZE Rumley3352% gamesnot enough data
Denise Henderson + Anthony Brooks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
April Korshin
113W–101L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
ELIZE Rumley
56W–59L career · type M · 7 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.67
4
Lucille Abe
66W–51L career · 12 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Denise Henderson
21W–22L career · type A · 11 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.59
3.5
Kima Kimura
33W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 9 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Antonio Monterrosa
31W–14L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Patrick Rumley
37W–35L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.