Teams

Spansel /18+/5.5/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kazik/18+/5.5/GACC000000
2Impastato/18/5.5/MCC000000
3Spansel /18+/5.5/CP000000
4Barrington/18+/5.5/CP000000
5Worsley/18/5.5/NOLTC000000
6Dunn/18+/5.5/NOCC000000
7Ackerman/18+/5.5/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Allison Vega
published 3
2.45
Hellen Cappo
published
2.41
Taylor Spansel
published
2.40
Kristyn Dadlez
published
2.35
Lindsay Legrand
published
2.26
Valerie Martinez
published
Colleen Owen
published 2.5
2.05
Melissa Aucoin
published
1.98
Ashley Delahoussaye
published 2.5
1.77
Courtney Jansen
published 2.5
Lauren Hodgins
published
Melissa Occhi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Vega + Melissa Occhi314 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Spansel + Valerie Martinez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Vega
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
2.54
Hellen Cappo
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Taylor Spansel
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Kristyn Dadlez
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
Lindsay Legrand
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35
Valerie Martinez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.26
2.5
Colleen Owen
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Aucoin
0W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Ashley Delahoussaye
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Courtney Jansen
0W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.77
Lauren Hodgins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Occhi
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.