Teams

Hardcourt Specialists 3.5

2025 Prince Georges Singles · Prince Georges Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-23vs Your New NemesisLost 01
L#3 SinglesOrlando Delgado vs Bill Hartman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs RacqueteersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristopher Bullman vs Jesse Brooks6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesOrlando Delgado vs Daniel Volker5-7, 2-6
2025-11-02vs Racquets UpLost 01
L#1 SinglesOrlando Delgado vs Xavier Rouse6-7, 2-6
2025-10-26vs Your New NemesisLost 01
L#2 SinglesXavier Cha vs Rudolph Isaac4-6, 2-6
2025-10-24vs RacqueteersWon 20
W#2 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Kyle Spinks6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesOrlando Delgado vs Erol Dolen6-1, 6-0
2025-10-12vs Racquets UpSplit 11
L#2 SinglesXavier Cha vs Taurean Branch3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesChristopher Bullman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-05vs Your New NemesisWon 10
W#3 SinglesXavier Cha vs Eric Wachter7-6, 6-0
2025-09-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesOrlando Delgado vs Brian Kim1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Christopher Bullman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Ali Hamdani
published 4
3.70
Tyrone D'angelis
published
3.64
Orlando Delgado
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.55
Bryan Bassig
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Xavier Cha
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Victor Sanchez
published
Prannoy Namala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Hamdani + Prannoy Namala134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Bullman
186W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Ali Hamdani
57W–51L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Tyrone D'angelis
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Orlando Delgado
168W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
3.5
Bryan Bassig
143W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Xavier Cha
121W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Victor Sanchez
32W–28L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Prannoy Namala
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.