Teams

MLong/SFarley (Queens)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Sep 23 6:30 PM
Weddington Swim and Racquet Club Inc
Sep 30 6:30 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
2026-09-09vs BBaker (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Rocchio / Madison Turner vs Danielle Gier / Sally Licandro6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Farley / Stephanie Sigmon vs Allison Purmort / Anna T Heath6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Witherspoon / Chrystell Cluck vs Anna Sison / Morgan Lee3-6, 2-6
2026-09-02vs SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Turner / Anna Hallmark vs Micahla Funderburk / Sarah Anderson7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlaina Altamura / Katie Witherspoon vs Hilary Diodato / Vicki Greenway6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Farley / Maggie Long vs Sarah Varner / Laura Seth6-2, 6-0
2026-08-31vs SLind (Bridgehampton)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMadison Turner / Shannon Farley vs Madison Murray / Tatiana Thomas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Dillon / Chrystell Cluck vs Shannon Lind / Kelly Lull3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaggie Long / Anna Hallmark vs Wendy Rossi / Lizette Conover2-6, 4-6
2026-08-19vs VShannon (Raintree)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesShannon Farley / Ashley Rocchio vs Susan Chandler / Margot Bizon6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Sigmon / Ashley Dillon vs Katie Eggers / Niki Koesel2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlaina Altamura / Katie Witherspoon vs Angela MacMurphy / Kimberly Powell1-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs KWagner (Jeff Adams)Won 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Farley / Stephanie Sigmon vs Patty Ni / Gabby Cirigliano6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAshley Dillon / Ashley Rocchio vs Mary Katherine Hardy / Milena Valdes Darias6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatie Witherspoon / Christina Salas vs Mae Pickering / Kayla Hall6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MMohammed/SAliota (Carmel)3090149
2MWalters (Carmel)3081453
3MWolf/JShelley (WSRC)3072559
4VShannon (Raintree)3081558
5RJoplin (Queens)3063770
6JWaleski (OPRC)2051227
7AMcGarry/AIngalls (CSRC)2051345
8LHumphries/Miller (Raintree)2042446
9TRicks (Queens)2042552
10LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC)2172667
11MMetzl (Sardis)2163761
12JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades)21541086
13AChristie/ASmith (PPRSC)21541074
14MLong/SFarley (Queens)1142548
15AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC)1142657
16HLee/SRock (Piper Glen)1133655
17RVora/SMoon (Lifetime)1133752
18DCazorla (BCC)1254980
19SLind (Bridgehampton)1254968
20ELeMaitre (Park Road)12541083
21SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)12541084
22MAllen/SStork (Sardis)12451195
23SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)12361387
24MLGarrison (Sardis)12361394
25CKing (Life Time)12271498
26PSweeney (FCC)122715101
27APessina/LAbhoulson (Queens)0224850
28SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)0224868
29BBaker (Queens)0224855
30CArevalo (Park Road)0224963
31CTharp (Queens)02151061
32JHargis (Pine Lake)02151069
33JMugnano (Queens)02061271
34LCulp (Park Road)03181694
35KWagner (Jeff Adams)030918105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Madison Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Shannon Farley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.93
Chrystell Cluck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Ashley Rocchio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Anna Hallmark
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Ashley Dillon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Maggie Long
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alaina Altamura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Christina Salas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Stephanie Sigmon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Katie Witherspoon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Farley + Anna Hallmark4172% games+18.0% vs expected
Alaina Altamura + Katie Witherspoon044 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Farley + Stephanie Sigmon303 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Farley + Madison Turner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Turner
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Shannon Farley
14W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Chrystell Cluck
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ashley Rocchio
5W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Anna Hallmark
7W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ashley Dillon
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Maggie Long
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Alaina Altamura
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christina Salas
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Sigmon
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Katie Witherspoon
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.