Teams

I'd Hit That - Chang

2022 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-13vs T1- R.Creek/ MarpleWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Barnett / Stefany Glessner vs Christie FitzGerald / Leanne Smith7-5, 6-3
2022-06-06vs T2 - Creighton Farms/ NormanLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Overman / Stefany Glessner vs Tamara Hurney / Jennie Simpson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-30vs T1- R.Creek/ MarpleLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Chestnut / Cheryl Phillips vs Joy Moynihan / Julianne Nitta3-6, 1-6
2022-05-25vs T2 - Creighton Farms/ NormanWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Hannah Auyang7-5, 5-4
2022-05-23vs Some Strings Attached - BixlerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Chestnut / Cheryl Phillips vs Aubrey Goodwin / Liliana Michaels6-1, 6-2
2022-05-03vs T2 - Creighton Farms/ NormanWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Teresa Smith6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLinda Chestnut / Cheryl Phillips vs Carolyn Mccarter / Ella Rash6-4, 6-2
2022-05-02vs Some Strings Attached - BixlerWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Jennifer Leibold6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStefany Glessner / Kathleen Barnett vs Amber Wooten / Joy Rahat6-2, 6-3
2022-04-04vs Some Strings Attached - BixlerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Chestnut / Jennifer Annessa vs Stephanie Holguin / Liz Ryan7-6, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Julie Kane
published
3.21
Jennifer Annessa
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Ingabritt Dorame
published 3
2.84
Alison Lopez
published 3
2.83
Amy Albanese
published 3
2.82
Stefany Glessner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Linda Chestnut
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.63
Janet Bradley
published
2.56
2.55
Kathleen Barnett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Chestnut + Stefany Glessner134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Kane
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Jennifer Annessa
71W–49L career · 10 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Ingabritt Dorame
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Alison Lopez
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Amy Albanese
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Stefany Glessner
45W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Linda Chestnut
46W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Janet Bradley
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Celeste Linthicum
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Kathleen Barnett
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.