Teams

LA - Kick Aces

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-22vs LA - Mulholland 2.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesMakena White / Alice Hsu vs Chi Kephart / Lauren Morphew6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRachel Friedman / Alexandra Kondracke vs Hillary Lowe / Bree Turner4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCleopatra Lim / Aashini Shah vs Sara Gershfeld / Frangelica Goulding4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-25vs WC LA - Double the FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Smuckler / Makena White vs Rachael Alberti / Elizabeth Leiner6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Kondracke / Hannah Udren vs Cindy Emanuel / Neha Desai5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Friedman / Aashini Shah vs Stacey McCarroll / Farhana Pargac5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAngelic Andrada / Makena White vs Cristina Siruno / Le Trieu0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAashini Shah / Jennifer Smuckler vs Homa Alamdari / Melissa Turai6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Flynn
published 3
2.53
Makena White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Jennifer Smuckler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Hannah Udren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Angelic Andrada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Claire Brines
published 2.5
2.27
Alice Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Alexandra Kondracke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Amanda Jamieson
published 2.5
Cleopatra Lim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Aashini Shah
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Molly Shannon
published
Rachel Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Makena White + Claire Brines033 matchesnot enough data
Claire Brines + Aashini Shah213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Flynn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Makena White
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Jennifer Smuckler
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.47
Hannah Udren
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
3
Angelic Andrada
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
2.5
Claire Brines
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Alice Hsu
6W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Alexandra Kondracke
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Jamieson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cleopatra Lim
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Aashini Shah
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Molly Shannon
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Meredith Salamunovich
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Friedman
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.