Teams

TLTC-Kradjan 7.0 18+

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Lupe Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Christopher Kradjan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-11-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohnni Cassidy / Christopher Kradjan vs Justin DeFour / Nikki Dizon6-1, 6-3
2023-11-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Kradjan / Brianna Simpson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohnni Cassidy / Christopher Kradjan vs Bill Boyett / Kristi Gonzalez6-3, 6-3
2023-11-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Simonson / Christopher Kradjan vs Sheri Borden / Douglas Bell6-2, 6-2
2023-10-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Kradjan / Sara Simonson vs Adrianne Severns / Jin Park6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJolene Rhodes / Lupe Gonzales vs Blue Barron / MaryAnn Baker6-3, 6-2
2023-09-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Kradjan / Johnni Cassidy vs Maya Kocian / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai6-4, 6-4
2023-09-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesLupe Gonzales / Esther Kim vs Lindsey Snow / Nathan Rettke6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Lupe Gonzales
76W–92L career
0%73%27%
3.04
3.5
Christopher Kradjan
127W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.03

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.