Teams

GJTC WSMITH

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - WS · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-01vs GJTC BTHOMPSONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTarrell Rodrigues / Steve Brown vs Coltan Gechter / Julio Holcomb6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKarsten Bump vs Noah Sears6-2, 6-3
2026-08-25vs GJTC DJOHNSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Ott / Wayne Smith vs Benjamin Blair / David Baugh6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBlake Bickham vs Chazz Lakin6-7, 2-6
2026-08-04vs GJTC KKILLIANLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarsten Bump / Steve Brown vs Jimmy Hillan / Curt Hansen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBlake Bickham vs Andrew BE3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWayne Smith / Tarrell Rodrigues vs Marlon Robles / Witt Reddin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-28vs GJTC RPLETTWon 20
W#1 DoublesBlake Bickham / Richard Arata vs Richard Plett / Jude Knaysi6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKarsten Bump / David Fuller vs Braden Kappius / Dan Birch6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC RPLETT21451187
2GJTC WSMITH1142662
3GJTC BTHOMPSON12451191
4GJTC PKNAYSI03271494

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Richard Ott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Blake Bickham
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Richard Arata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Karsten Bump
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Tarrell Rodrigues
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
David Fuller
published 3.5
2.98
Wayne Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tarrell Rodrigues + Blake Bickham5260% games+11.7% vs expected
Wayne Smith + Blake Bickham4356% games+8.3% vs expected
Blake Bickham + Richard Arata15161% games+5.6% vs expected
Wayne Smith + Richard Arata3349% games−1.8% vs expected
Richard Ott + Tarrell Rodrigues3249% gamesnot enough data
Richard Ott + Richard Arata213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Arata + David Fuller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Ott
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Blake Bickham
77W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Richard Arata
51W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Karsten Bump
60W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Tarrell Rodrigues
62W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
David Fuller
7W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Wayne Smith
27W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.