Teams

Reefe

2022 Frederick Combo · Frederick Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Ostlie / Teresa Reefe vs Kelly Temple / Jodi Hathaway3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-22vs Thongphok Combo 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristin Ostlie / Teresa Reefe vs Laura Haney / Li Ives6-4, 6-3
2022-09-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaureen DeGrange / Catherine Iosue vs Sharon Edelstein / Donna Jones6-4, 6-3
2022-09-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Veronica Best vs Evelien Josselin / Jodi Hathaway2-6, 1-6
2022-09-06vs Smash Girls - KesslerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJodie Phillips / Kristin Ostlie vs Evelien Josselin / Jodi Hathaway2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Monica DeAgostino vs Linda McArthur / Roxanna Nemec5-7, 4-3
2022-08-31vs Thongphok Combo 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMeghan Meade / Kristin Ostlie vs Laura Haney / Hannah Arnold Smith6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Giselle Medina vs Paula Mittel / Kim Roberts6-7, 2-4
2022-08-23vs Thongphok Combo 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Greene / Catherine Iosue vs Laura Haney / Hannah Arnold Smith0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Reefe / Monica DeAgostino vs Kelly Turner / Robin Dickerson3-6, 6-6
2022-08-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Ostlie / Giselle Medina vs Kelly Temple / Megan Wilhelm6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeghan Bresee / Catherine Iosue vs Sharon Edelstein / Jodi Hathaway6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Amy LaMoure
published 4
3.20
Amanda Mason
published 3.5
3.13
Jodie Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristin Ostlie
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Giselle Medina
published 3.5
3.04
Teresa Reefe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Kristy Sullivan
published
2.92
Kathy Greene
published
2.85
Lesley Leonard
published
2.84
Kristen Hostler
published
2.83
Catherine Iosue
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Monica DeAgostino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Cathy Cunningham
published 3
2.54
Lori Grimaldi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica DeAgostino + Lori Grimaldi81744% games−0.9% vs expected
Teresa Reefe + Monica DeAgostino72343% games−3.9% vs expected
Teresa Reefe + Kristin Ostlie4548% gamesnot enough data
Amy LaMoure + Kristin Ostlie4551% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Reefe + Lori Grimaldi134 matchesnot enough data
Kristy Sullivan + Lesley Leonard314 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Iosue + Kathy Greene123 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Reefe + Lesley Leonard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy LaMoure
172W–217L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Amanda Mason
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jodie Phillips
110W–116L career · 8 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kristin Ostlie
203W–230L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Teresa Reefe
144W–118L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
Kristy Sullivan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kathy Greene
31W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Lesley Leonard
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Kristen Hostler
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Catherine Iosue
128W–113L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Monica DeAgostino
77W–123L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cathy Cunningham
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Lori Grimaldi
51W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.