Teams

Bechtold/CCC/Foothills

2024 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-08vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Sandra Reid1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Bechtold / Jody Cecil vs Hilary May / Gloria Gordon4-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs Dale-Sharkey/DV/foothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Bechtold / Jody Cecil vs Phoenix Fisher / Kathy Evans6-1, 6-2
2024-04-24vs Schultz/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Corcoran / Carolyn Carlile vs Brandon Bray / Heather Mills2-6, 3-6
2024-04-17vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJody Cecil / Linda Trofast vs Marianna Geyer / Amy Harline6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Ana Paula Schweitzer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-20vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Trofast / Carolyn Carlile vs Marianna Geyer / Hilary May2-6, 0-6
2024-03-16vs Schultz/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Brandon Bray2-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Corcoran / Carolyn Carlile vs Gloria Gordon / Sandra Reid3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-02-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Colleen Sharkey0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Linda Corcoran
published
2.48
Beth Bechtold
published 3
2.43
Jody Cecil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Carolyn Carlile
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.27
Laura Lever
published
1.98
Tammy Brindle
published
Kelly Kastelic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Lever + Beth Bechtold5169% games+16.0% vs expected
Laura Lever + Tammy Brindle3251% games−2.9% vs expected
Carolyn Carlile + Jody Cecil81043% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Corcoran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Beth Bechtold
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Jody Cecil
26W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Carolyn Carlile
51W–81L career · 10 lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Laura Lever
14W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
Tammy Brindle
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Kelly Kastelic
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.