Teams

CC Avila Mulry 7.0W

2025 USTA CC Summer Adult 65 & OVER · CC USTA 65 & OVER 7.0W

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05vs CC Monarch Trilogy DeOrnellasLost 03
L#1 DoublesCherie Charbonneau / Elisabeth Grossman vs Jeannie Crawford / Trish Ross3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Brewer / Joy Swann vs Lori Deornellas / Hilda Fischer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Jessie Mulry vs Stacie Reeve / Donna Tracy2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-26vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Hostetter 7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatti Holanda / Kathleen York vs Ann Paredes / Carol Hall3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCherie Charbonneau / Elisabeth Grossman vs Roberta Fischer / Pamela Hostetter5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessie Mulry / Joy Swann vs Amy Stets / Deborah Beatty3-6, 4-6
2025-09-21vs CC Monarch Trilogy DeOrnellasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatti Holanda / Cherie Charbonneau vs Cathy Robeck / Paula Olson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Brewer / Joy Swann vs Gail Edry / Stacie Reeve6-4, 7-5
2025-09-20vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Hostetter 7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Windman / Patti Holanda vs Melanie Topp / Carol Hall6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCherie Charbonneau / Kathleen York vs Amy Stets / Deborah Beatty2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Brewer / Joy Swann vs Teresa Schmutte / Heather Loveman-Krelle0-6, 5-7
2025-09-05vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Hostetter 7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessie Mulry / Cherie Charbonneau vs Roberta Fischer / Ann Paredes4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoy Swann / Anita Stohr vs Deborah Beatty / Teresa Schmutte3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Sandy Volk vs Carol Hall / Melanie Topp2-6, 4-6
2025-08-24vs CC Monarch Trilogy DeOrnellasLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessie Mulry / Cherie Charbonneau vs Melanie Sundstrom / Christine Sweeney7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Grossman / Anita Stohr vs Morri Nash / Jeannie Crawford7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarty Nitzberg / Sandy Volk vs Hilda Fischer / Myrdith King4-6, 4-6
2025-08-18vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Hostetter 7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Grossman / Kathleen York vs Edith Martin / Roberta Fischer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessie Mulry / Cherie Charbonneau vs Melanie Topp / Teresa Schmutte2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnita Stohr / Sheree Swanson vs Heather Loveman-Krelle / Ann Paredes1-6, 0-6
2025-08-17vs CC Monarch Trilogy DeOrnellasLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Windman / Patti Holanda vs Gail Edry / Melanie Sundstrom6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen York / Elisabeth Grossman vs Hilda Fischer / Bonnie Lynam2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Stohr / Sheree Swanson vs Trish Ross / Jeannie Crawford2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 65 & OVER 7.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elisabeth Grossman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Jessie Mulry
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Cherie Charbonneau
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Anita Stohr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Joy Swann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Marty Nitzberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Windman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen York
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patti Holanda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Volk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheree Swanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Mulry + Cherie Charbonneau1442% gamesnot enough data
Marty Nitzberg + Sandy Volk044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Brewer + Joy Swann123 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Charbonneau + Elisabeth Grossman033 matchesnot enough data
Elisabeth Grossman + Kathleen York033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Brewer
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elisabeth Grossman
2W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessie Mulry
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Anita Stohr
35W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joy Swann
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Marty Nitzberg
16W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Janet Windman
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen York
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Holanda
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Volk
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheree Swanson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.