Teams

FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 40AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Giannina Hawkes
published 4
3.43
Nichelle Watkins
published
3.39
3.38
Judith Mattingly
published
3.35
Justine Baker
published
3.32
Kimberly Herculson
published
3.31
Shelby Moeller
published
3.28
Teri Giusti-Cobb
published
3.26
Ginger Kelly
published 3.5
3.19
Beth Cuniberti
published 3.5
3.08
Tiffany Dinardo
published
2.89
Susan Bedsole
published
2.72
Jill Goldberg
published
2.67
Dana Simonds
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Dinardo + Beth Cuniberti1438% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Kelly + Teri Giusti-Cobb123 matchesnot enough data
Teri Giusti-Cobb + Beth Cuniberti213 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Cosentino Manning + Tiffany Dinardo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Giannina Hawkes
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
4.07
Nichelle Watkins
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.43
Natalie Cosentino Manning
3W–22L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.39
Judith Mattingly
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
Justine Baker
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Kimberly Herculson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Shelby Moeller
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Teri Giusti-Cobb
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Ginger Kelly
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Beth Cuniberti
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Tiffany Dinardo
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Susan Bedsole
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
Jill Goldberg
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Dana Simonds
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.