Teams

UPTA54+FF/Lawson/HollyTree

2024 Fall 54 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.0 Women FF

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-06vs UPTA54/Murry/CardinalLost 02
L#1 DoublesGretchen Lawson / Tarah M Smith vs Sandi Tolly / Chimene Evans2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Wright / Susan San Francisco vs Catherine Murry / Carol Shrum3-6, 1-6
2024-10-30vs Keowee Key/Party at the NetLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Zeager / Sandra Wright vs Jennifer Rowe / Laurie Sinkele3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTess King / Susan San Francisco vs Vicki Tougaw / Kaleen Dixon2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLouise Heizer / Melanie DeWitt vs Susan Kaurloto / Denise Aylor0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-16vs UPTA54/Murry/CardinalSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTarah M Smith / Lea Blanchard vs Sandi Tolly / Carol Shrum0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Zeager / Melanie DeWitt vs Sheila Voigt / Catherine Murry6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Claudia Kornaros
published 3
2.73
Tarah M Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Sandra Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Grae Turner
published 3
2.61
Gretchen Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Melanie DeWitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Diane Zeager
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.41
Susan San Francisco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Gene Oswalt
published 3
Lea Blanchard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Heizer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tess King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie DeWitt + Gene Oswalt1447% games−0.8% vs expected
Tarah M Smith + Gretchen Lawson3544% games−4.8% vs expected
Melanie DeWitt + Susan San Francisco4743% games−5.4% vs expected
Gretchen Lawson + Diane Zeager4441% games−17.5% vs expected
Lea Blanchard + Gretchen Lawson033 matchesnot enough data
Melanie DeWitt + Gretchen Lawson123 matchesnot enough data
Melanie DeWitt + Diane Zeager213 matchesnot enough data
Susan San Francisco + Tarah M Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claudia Kornaros
58W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Tarah M Smith
10W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Sandra Wright
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Grae Turner
6W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Gretchen Lawson
22W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.61
Melanie DeWitt
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Diane Zeager
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Susan San Francisco
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.41
3
Gene Oswalt
2W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.38
Lea Blanchard
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Louise Heizer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tess King
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.