Teams

A18 4.0M 3 CRC Repko

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Summer

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-23vs A18 4.0M 4 WR DowningWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichael Geiger / Jay Owens vs Charles Manak / Richard Stein6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJustin Stark vs Mitchell Curtis6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNiyaz Haghbin / KYLE SHRAIBERG vs Chet Delong / Keith Curley6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNeal Repko vs Doug Sachtleben6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephen Bold / Matt Winograd vs Eric Hagen / Chetak Chakkarwar6-0, 6-2
2025-06-09vs NEO/Dorsch/A18/4.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesAtul Chopra / Michael Geiger vs Andrew Kraig / Jax Currington3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNick Smedira vs Jeremy Bryan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJay Owens / Richard Freeman vs Suboor Jamal / Will Schultz3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNeal Repko / Niyaz Haghbin vs Andrew Payerl / Taylor Benjamin6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Neal Repko
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.81
Justin Stark
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Richard Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Jay Owens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
KYLE SHRAIBERG
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Atul Chopra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Mark Mikhaiel
published
3.63
Stephen Bold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Marc Estafanous
published
3.14
Sergio Thal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.02
Adam Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Leonard Komoroski
published
Matt Winograd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Geiger
published
Nick Smedira
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Niyaz Haghbin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Owens + Richard Freeman3350% games−6.5% vs expected
Niyaz Haghbin + Mark Mikhaiel134 matchesnot enough data
Atul Chopra + Richard Freeman314 matchesnot enough data
KYLE SHRAIBERG + Richard Freeman123 matchesnot enough data
Niyaz Haghbin + Sergio Thal123 matchesnot enough data
Niyaz Haghbin + Neal Repko303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neal Repko
47W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Justin Stark
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Richard Freeman
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Jay Owens
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
KYLE SHRAIBERG
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Atul Chopra
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Mark Mikhaiel
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Stephen Bold
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Marc Estafanous
12W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
Sergio Thal
27W–85L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Adam Jacobs
0W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Leonard Komoroski
5W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Winograd
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Geiger
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Smedira
25W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Niyaz Haghbin
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.