Teams

Westwood Henry 9.0

2025 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-29vs MTC Budlong 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Brown / Lauren Jones vs Richard Cordrey / Nancy Pitts6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Baker / Anna Shea vs Hanna Mogilnicka / Andrew Kristensen6-2, 6-2
2025-03-15vs MAC Snow 9.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Prince / Becky Oatts vs Allen Huang / Courtney Greiner2-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs MAC Meyer - Barefoot 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Prince / Becky Oatts vs Eric Spivack / Jamie Cochrane4-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs Burkwood Decker 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBecky Oatts / Ryan Baker vs Katherine Carnohan / Cary Polk7-5, 5-6
2025-02-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesBecky Oatts / Zachary King vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-26vs SCC Riehm 9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Prince / Becky Oatts vs Maren Riehm / Drew Lineberger6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
published 5
4.66
Ashley Schmitz
published 5
4.56
Joseph Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Seth Feibelman
published
Anna Shea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.22
Richard Godsey
published
4.17
Todd Prince
published
4.16
Ryan Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Charles Wayland
published 4.5
3.98
Becky Oatts
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
3.68
Katy Heath McDaniel
published
3.68
Lauren Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Laura Perry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Seth Feibelman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Ashley Schmitz
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.66
Joseph Brown
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
Seth Feibelman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.41
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Todd Prince
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Ryan Baker
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Charles Wayland
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Becky Oatts
57W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Bailey Mountcastle
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Katy Heath McDaniel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Lauren Jones
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ashley Wright Henry
47W–51L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Laura Perry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.