Teams

NITA E 30W18e Courts Plus (Clifford)

2022 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kleinschmidt / Monica Anderson vs Katie Clancy / Stephanie Wilson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah OMalley / Reda Cepulenaite vs Kim Moore / Valerie Wasilchuk6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKristin Brown / Deborah OMalley vs Carol Henry / Jody Lakota4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErica White vs Rebecca Gross6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesReda Cepulenaite / Marion Thompson vs Lynn Kaczmarz / Audrey Marchesini7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Reda Cepulenaite vs Tina Cunningham / Lynn Gonzalez6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCrystal Leighton vs Rebecca Gross6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Brown / Deborah OMalley vs Audrey Marchesini / Jody Lakota6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Clifford / Barbara Kleinschmidt vs Lynn Kaczmarz / Sharon Hahn7-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Monica Anderson vs Liz Schwandt / Lauren Cangilla6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesANDREA TAHLIER vs Mandy Cowen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Kristin Brown vs Helen Micchelli / Kriston Ewoldt6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErica White / Barbara Kleinschmidt vs Ashwini Shukla / Ginger Bulat6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesReda Cepulenaite / Monica Anderson vs Larisa Adamian / Zaneta Gintautas3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBarbara Kleinschmidt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGina Masciola / Kristin Brown vs Julie Gervais / Caroline Long4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Clifford / Marion Thompson vs Teri-Lynn Tomazic / Peggy Roeske4-6, 3-5
L#1 DoublesKristin Brown / Reda Cepulenaite vs Chalise Short / Hilary Fife6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErica White vs Kelly Voelker4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKristin Brown / Gina Masciola vs Helene Braun / Denise McKenna7-5, 3-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesANDREA TAHLIER vs Ashwini Shukla6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Hamm / Toni Mountcastle vs Lauren Cangilla / Mandy Cowen6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDebbie Clifford / Marion Thompson vs Ginger Bulat / Kriston Ewoldt3-6, 5-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Monica Anderson vs Shilpa Iyer / Julie Gervais6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesANDREA TAHLIER vs Larisa Adamian6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGina Masciola / Reda Cepulenaite vs Zaneta Gintautas / Peggy Roeske7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 30W18b Rush Copley (Freund/Gintautas)62201229233
2NITA E 30W18e Courts Plus (Clifford)53211127223
3NITA E 30W18d Five Star (Schwandt/McKenna)44141841285
4NITA E 30W18c HealthTrack (Brown/Chivardi35161635242
5NITA E 30W18a Challenge Fitness (Kaczmarz2692347325

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Crystal Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.83
ANDREA TAHLIER
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Erica White
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Toni Mountcastle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Reda Cepulenaite
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Gina Masciola
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Barbara Kleinschmidt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Debbie Clifford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deborah OMalley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Marion Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Masciola + Reda Cepulenaite4350% games+2.3% vs expected
Gina Masciola + Toni Mountcastle4349% games−7.3% vs expected
Barbara Kleinschmidt + Reda Cepulenaite3352% games−7.4% vs expected
Debbie Clifford + Marion Thompson131051% games−8.0% vs expected
Debbie Clifford + Deborah OMalley2347% gamesnot enough data
Deborah OMalley + Reda Cepulenaite5059% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Kleinschmidt + Marion Thompson134 matchesnot enough data
Toni Mountcastle + Reda Cepulenaite404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
4.12
4
ANDREA TAHLIER
86W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Erica White
29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Toni Mountcastle
235W–198L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Reda Cepulenaite
78W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Gina Masciola
95W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Barbara Kleinschmidt
95W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Debbie Clifford
55W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Deborah OMalley
39W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marion Thompson
63W–216L career · 3 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.