Teams

Smead/Greeneville

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Greeneville · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-20vs Cox/GreenevilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Smead / Angela Cutshall vs Holly Grammer / Sarah LaGuardia6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCathy Holloway / Carrie Cave vs Regan Jordan / Holli Cox6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-19vs Cox/GreenevilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Smead / Angela Cutshall vs Holli Cox / Holly Grammer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Joy / Lara Neumann vs Shannon Hinkle / Sarah LaGuardia4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-13vs Cox/GreenevilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Joy / Cathy Holloway vs Dana Wenzell / Regan Jordan7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Cutshall / Lara Neumann vs Holli Cox / Shannon Hinkle4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-06vs Cox/GreenevilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Cave / Kathy Joy vs Lynne Little / Sarah LaGuardia3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Cutshall / Lara Neumann vs Shannon Hinkle / Regan Jordan6-3, 6-2
2026-04-22vs Cox/GreenevilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Woods / Carrie Cave vs Holli Cox / Shannon Hinkle6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPamela Smead / Angela Cutshall vs Dana Wenzell / Regan Jordan6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Carrie Cave
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Pamela Smead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Lara Neumann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Cathy Holloway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Angela Cutshall
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Smead + Angela Cutshall6453% games+9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Cave
2W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Pamela Smead
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Lara Neumann
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cathy Holloway
3W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Angela Cutshall
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.