Teams

Sports Mall-Team Fun

2022 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

12 players · average NTRP 2.92 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-12-10vs Liberty Park Tennis-Olson/MasseyLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesHolli Allred / Hannah Galbreath vs MacY Bell / Erin Massey2-6, 4-6
2022-12-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-El FuegoWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesJamie Crews / Jill Raemisch vs Megan Berceau / Shelly Kaihatu4-6, 5-3, 1-0
2022-11-19vs Liberty Park Tennis-Soffe/LoveWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesStephanie Morris / Jill Raemisch vs Ann Monroy / Sandy Weeks6-1, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesHolli Allred / Olivia Moreton vs Alisa Kesler / Kimberly Chytraus6-1, 6-2
W#1 Female DoublesJill Raemisch / Jamie Crews vs Kristi Callister / Melanie Knaphus6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Annie Mortensen
published 3
2.84
Jessica Eckert
published
2.80
Hannah Galbreath
published 3
Jamie Crews
published 3
2.64
Jill Raemisch
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Shawna Smart
published
2.54
Stephanie Morris
published
2.54
Holli Allred
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
Lisa Armstrong
published
Anne MacKey
published 2.5
1.91
Olivia Moreton
published
Lauren Griswold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Crews + Jessica Eckert7162% games+17.3% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Annie Mortensen6263% games+12.2% vs expected
Olivia Moreton + Holli Allred4258% games+8.4% vs expected
Stephanie Morris + Annie Mortensen5259% games+7.2% vs expected
Olivia Moreton + Annie Mortensen9360% games+5.8% vs expected
Olivia Moreton + Jill Raemisch3257% games+5.3% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Jessica Eckert8652% games+3.3% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Jamie Crews4454% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annie Mortensen
89W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jessica Eckert
89W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Hannah Galbreath
29W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Jamie Crews
46W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Jill Raemisch
48W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Shawna Smart
108W–123L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Stephanie Morris
53W–42L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Holli Allred
49W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lisa Armstrong
59W–152L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Anne MacKey
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olivia Moreton
85W–121L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Lauren Griswold
25W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.