Teams

Babcock National - Jicha

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Fall NONADV · 6.5 W Thursday EVE

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-14vs Gulf Harbour - WonnenbergWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Nuthals / Heidi Balter vs Candace Kelly / Tasha Morris3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Bieniek / Debra Stack vs MONICA WONNENBERG / Amy Prenger6-3, 2-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Workman / Rebecca Kroseberg vs Janet Jenkins / Missy Steward7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Thursday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Heather Humann
published 3.5
3.22
Karen Nuthals
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Lori Bieniek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Theresa Raker
published
2.97
Anne Mcdonald
published 3
2.95
Heidi Balter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Debra Stack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Beth Workman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Diane Chilcote
published 3
Rebecca Kroseberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Workman + Theresa Raker7557% games+7.7% vs expected
Lori Bieniek + Beth Workman2745% games−4.3% vs expected
Anne Mcdonald + Karen Nuthals1438% games−6.9% vs expected
Lori Bieniek + Theresa Raker134 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Balter + Karen Nuthals224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Kroseberg + Beth Workman123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Workman + Anne Mcdonald033 matchesnot enough data
Beth Workman + Karen Nuthals033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Humann
50W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Karen Nuthals
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Lori Bieniek
132W–126L career · 1 line in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
Theresa Raker
23W–26L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Anne Mcdonald
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Heidi Balter
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Debra Stack
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Beth Workman
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Diane Chilcote
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.46
Rebecca Kroseberg
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.